{ "entity_id": "O-000810", "folder": "Screen-Australia", "name": "Screen Australia", "type": "Corporate Commonwealth Entity", "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth", "portfolio": "Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, \r\nCommunications, Sport and the Arts", "website": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/", "data_status": "partial", "completeness": { "has_strategy_brief": false, "has_strategy_structured": true, "has_vision": false, "has_kpi_targets": false, "has_kpi_results": false, "has_strategy_overview": true, "has_legislation_text": true, "has_legislation_structured": false, "has_global_initiatives_text": true, "has_global_initiatives_structured": false, "n_global_initiatives": 0, "has_ideas": true, "has_artifacts": true, "n_ideas": 12, "n_legislation": 0, "n_artifacts": 8, "n_kpi_targets": 0, "n_kpi_results": 0, "n_outcomes": 0, "verified_own_data": true }, "strategy_profile": { "status": "needs_review", "confidence": "medium", "summary": "", "official_site_url": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/", "source_documents": [ { "type": "strategie", "title": "Download File : Screen Currency 2 – Methods Discussion Paper", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf?v=1776991989", "period": "2026", "confidence": "medium" }, { "type": "annual_report", "title": "Annual Report", "url": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/annual-report", "period": "recent", "confidence": "high" }, { "type": "corporate_plan", "title": "Corporate Plan", "url": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/corporate-plan", "period": "recent", "confidence": "high" } ], "purpose": null, "vision": null, "strategic_priorities": [], "values": [], "outcomes": [], "performance_measures": [], "document_alignment_terms": { "must_support": [], "watch_terms": [], "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": [] }, "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete." }, "global_initiatives": null, "strategy": { "reporting_period": "2024-25", "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26", "vision": null, "vision_source_page": null, "purposes": null, "purposes_source_page": null, "how_we_deliver": null, "how_we_deliver_source_page": null, "government_priorities": [], "outcomes": [], "values": [], "values_framework_name": null, "kpi_targets_2025_26": [], "kpi_results_2024_25": [], "_source_urls": { "annual_report_url": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/annual-report", "corporate_plan_url": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/corporate-plan" } }, "ideas": [ { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "small", "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners", "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.", "quote": "SWIG advise caution on the limits of these approaches)20\nOther measures that are sometimes included in Economic Impact studies include\n• Supporting training and skill building (reducing loss of talent “brain drain”) 21\n• Supporting employment in broader arts and culture sectors22\nSome attempts to measure economic impact also engage with more extended models such as the\nRIOM Regional Input Output Model – a closed model that applies the ABS transaction tables with\nemployment and demand data to model the impact of changes in demand on regional economies,\nestimating changes in output, product and Gross State product.23\nMany of these indirect impact measures are used alongside the direct economic measures to\ncalculate total Return on Investment (ROI) or multipliers (as in, every $1 spent in a given area\ngenerates $XX in Economic Impact).", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "strategies/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf?v=1776991989)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "large", "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact", "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "SWIG advise caution on the limits of these approaches)20\nOther measures that are sometimes included in Economic Impact studies include\n• Supporting training and skill building (reducing loss of talent “brain drain”) 21\n• Supporting employment in broader arts and culture sectors22\nSome attempts to measure economic impact also engage with more extended models such as the\nRIOM Regional Input Output Model – a closed model that applies the ABS transaction tables with\nemployment and demand data to model the impact of changes in demand on regional economies,\nestimating changes in output, product and Gross State product.23\nMany of these indirect impact measures are used alongside the direct economic measures to\ncalculate total Return on Investment (ROI) or multipliers (as in, every $1 spent in a given area\ngenerates $XX in Economic Impact).", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "strategies/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf?v=1776991989)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "small", "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries", "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.", "quote": "16\nMeasuring and understanding diversity in Australian TV drama 18\nMethod and scope 19\nPart 1: On‑screen diversity 22\nHow we measured on‑screen diversity 24\nFirst Nations 27\nCultural background (non‑First Nations) 33\nDisability 40\nGender identity and sexual orientation 47\nOccupational and social status 52\nAge 54\nDiversity in children’s drama and comedy 56\nRegional and remote Australia 61\nDiversity of actors 62\nPart 2: Challenges and opportunities 70\nThe context: an industry raising the bar 72\nLived experience and authentic storytelling 73\nWhen lived experience is undervalued: carrying the burden and reputational risk 74\nFirst Nations perspectives: rebalancing the scale 75\nThe need for diverse leadership 76\nCommissioning and financial risk 77\nSpotlight on disability 78\nPage 4", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "large", "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system", "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.", "quote": "16\nMeasuring and understanding diversity in Australian TV drama 18\nMethod and scope 19\nPart 1: On‑screen diversity 22\nHow we measured on‑screen diversity 24\nFirst Nations 27\nCultural background (non‑First Nations) 33\nDisability 40\nGender identity and sexual orientation 47\nOccupational and social status 52\nAge 54\nDiversity in children’s drama and comedy 56\nRegional and remote Australia 61\nDiversity of actors 62\nPart 2: Challenges and opportunities 70\nThe context: an industry raising the bar 72\nLived experience and authentic storytelling 73\nWhen lived experience is undervalued: carrying the burden and reputational risk 74\nFirst Nations perspectives: rebalancing the scale 75\nThe need for diverse leadership 76\nCommissioning and financial risk 77\nSpotlight on disability 78\nPage 4", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "small", "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates", "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.", "quote": "The Nielsen report highlights that the\nabsent from broadcast and under‑represented on full diversity of Asian Americans is not represented\ncable (0.9%) but were over‑represented on digital and that stereotypes remain a concern.142\nplatforms in 2020–21 (2.2%). ‘Latinx’ and ‘Asian’\nleads were under‑represented across platforms\n134 Broadcast programs: 73%; cable: 60%; digital: 62%.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "large", "title": "Single front door for life-event based services", "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.", "quote": "The Nielsen report highlights that the\nabsent from broadcast and under‑represented on full diversity of Asian Americans is not represented\ncable (0.9%) but were over‑represented on digital and that stereotypes remain a concern.142\nplatforms in 2020–21 (2.2%). ‘Latinx’ and ‘Asian’\nleads were under‑represented across platforms\n134 Broadcast programs: 73%; cable: 60%; digital: 62%.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "small", "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting", "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.", "quote": "The updated framework allows\ncomponents 1 and 2 to be directly comparable and also avoids the risk of double-counting\nthat was possible in the previous framework.43\nThis new approach was intended to offer a pragmatic approach to create a ‘consistent and\ntransparent’ decision-making framework, through a narrowed scope of activity (excluding, for\nexample, computer systems design and related activity, clothing and footwear\nmanufacturing, wholesaling and retailing) to ensure that the cultural and creative sector\ncould ‘see itself’ in the new measure.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "strategies/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf?v=1776991989)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "large", "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops", "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.", "quote": "The updated framework allows\ncomponents 1 and 2 to be directly comparable and also avoids the risk of double-counting\nthat was possible in the previous framework.43\nThis new approach was intended to offer a pragmatic approach to create a ‘consistent and\ntransparent’ decision-making framework, through a narrowed scope of activity (excluding, for\nexample, computer systems design and related activity, clothing and footwear\nmanufacturing, wholesaling and retailing) to ensure that the cultural and creative sector\ncould ‘see itself’ in the new measure.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "strategies/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf?v=1776991989)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Citizen Participation", "scale": "small", "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking", "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.", "quote": "[Page 25]\nSeeing Ourselves 2 | Screen Australia\nPart 2: Challenges and opportunities\n● Findings from:\n○ consultations with 35 participants across 23 industry organisations\n○ in‑depth interviews with 28 key stakeholders including decision makers and diverse\nscreen practitioners\nPart 3: International context\n● Scan of related research findings and activity in the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand\nPart 4: Tools and resources\n● A compilation of publicly available resources\nFor more on the method and scope see:\n● How we measured on‑screen diversity\n● Appendix A: Key terms and definitions\n● Appendix B: List of titles\n● Appendix C: List of consultation and interview participants\nSafe Harbour\nPage 21", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Citizen Participation", "scale": "large", "title": "Always-on policy participation platform", "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.", "quote": "[Page 25]\nSeeing Ourselves 2 | Screen Australia\nPart 2: Challenges and opportunities\n● Findings from:\n○ consultations with 35 participants across 23 industry organisations\n○ in‑depth interviews with 28 key stakeholders including decision makers and diverse\nscreen practitioners\nPart 3: International context\n● Scan of related research findings and activity in the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand\nPart 4: Tools and resources\n● A compilation of publicly available resources\nFor more on the method and scope see:\n● How we measured on‑screen diversity\n● Appendix A: Key terms and definitions\n● Appendix B: List of titles\n● Appendix C: List of consultation and interview participants\nSafe Harbour\nPage 21", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "small", "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases", "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.", "quote": "[Page 109]\nSeeing Ourselves 2 | Screen Australia\nDisability\nIn our current study of Australian TV drama, only The UK’s Diamond project found ‘disabled people’\n6.6% of main characters were identified as disabled comprised 8.1% of lead actors in scripted TV\n– well below the population benchmark (18%). programmed in 2020–21; and 7% of all on‑screen\nDisabled character representation was lower still roles in drama; 5.9% in comedy; and 12% in\nin comedy (3.6%) and children’s programs (3.8%). children’s.160 While these results are higher\nSignificant under‑representation of disabled people than the Seeing Ourselves 2 results for disabled\non screen and in the industry is also a common actors playing main roles (3.9%), the findings\nfinding across international reports. are not comparable as the Diamond project is\nbased on a confidential survey of screen industry", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "large", "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments", "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "[Page 109]\nSeeing Ourselves 2 | Screen Australia\nDisability\nIn our current study of Australian TV drama, only The UK’s Diamond project found ‘disabled people’\n6.6% of main characters were identified as disabled comprised 8.1% of lead actors in scripted TV\n– well below the population benchmark (18%). programmed in 2020–21; and 7% of all on‑screen\nDisabled character representation was lower still roles in drama; 5.9% in comedy; and 12% in\nin comedy (3.6%) and children’s programs (3.8%). children’s.160 While these results are higher\nSignificant under‑representation of disabled people than the Seeing Ourselves 2 results for disabled\non screen and in the industry is also a common actors playing main roles (3.9%), the findings\nfinding across international reports. are not comparable as the Diamond project is\nbased on a confidential survey of screen industry", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf (https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] } ], "legislation_administered": [], "artifacts": [ { "category": "strategies", "year": "2026", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf?v=1776991989", "file": "strategies/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf", "bytes": 1708428, "link_text": "Download File : Screen Currency 2 – Methods Discussion Paper" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2025", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Correspondence-and-email-policy.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/Correspondence-and-email-policy.pdf", "bytes": 83083, "link_text": "Correspondence and Email policy" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2026", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Australia-SCREEN-CURRENCY-Request-for-Proposals.pdf?v=1777435433", "file": "other-pdfs/Screen-Australia-SCREEN-CURRENCY-Request-for-Proposals.pdf", "bytes": 863263, "link_text": "Download File : Screen Currency 2 – Request for Proposals" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2026", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Scene-Change-Report-April-2026.pdf?v=1777352852", "file": "other-pdfs/Scene-Change-Report-April-2026.pdf", "bytes": 3180559, "link_text": "Download File : Scene Change" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2024-25", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Drama-Report-2024-25-Key-Findings.pdf?v=1775615520", "file": "other-pdfs/Drama-Report-2024-25-Key-Findings.pdf", "bytes": 1320793, "link_text": "Download File : Drama Report 2024-25 Key Findings" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2025", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf?v=1775615862", "file": "other-pdfs/Seeing-Ourselves-2-Full-Report-Accessible-PDF.pdf", "bytes": 9766210, "link_text": "Download File : Seeing Ourselves 2: Diversity, equity and inclusion in Australian TV drama" }, { "category": "annual-reports", "year": "recent", "url": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/annual-report", "file": "annual-reports/recent.pdf", "bytes": 8454399, "link_text": "Annual Report" }, { "category": "corporate-plans", "year": "recent", "url": "http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/corporate-plan", "file": "corporate-plans/recent.pdf", "bytes": 6520728, "link_text": "Corporate Plan" } ], "_meta": { "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:13:47+00:00", "strategy_brief_meta": { "model": "nova-micro", "folder": "Screen-Australia", "annual_report": { "file": null, "url": "", "year": null }, "corporate_plan": { "file": "strategies\\Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.txt", "url": "https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screen-Currency-2-Methods-Discussion-Paper.pdf?v=1776991989", "year": null }, "usage": { "input_tokens": 12741, "output_tokens": 155, "total_tokens": 12896, "model": "nova-micro" }, "cost_usd": 0.00046763500000000004, "elapsed_seconds": 2.11, "generated_at": "2026-05-13T10:33:42+00:00" }, "ideas_manifest": { "entity_id": "O-000810", "entity_name": "Screen Australia", "folder_name": "Screen-Australia", "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:12.701562+00:00", "idea_count": 12, "markdown": "ideas/Screen-Australia_ideas.md", "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl", "inputs": [ "Screen-Australia_strategy-overview.md", "strategy-evidence.json", "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json" ] }, "global_intel_meta": null } }