{
  "entity_id": "B-000726",
  "folder": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
  "name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
  "type": "National Law Body",
  "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth",
  "portfolio": "Health, Disability and Ageing",
  "website": "http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/",
  "data_status": "stub",
  "completeness": {
    "has_strategy_brief": false,
    "has_strategy_structured": false,
    "has_vision": false,
    "has_kpi_targets": false,
    "has_kpi_results": false,
    "has_strategy_overview": true,
    "has_legislation_text": true,
    "has_legislation_structured": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_text": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_structured": false,
    "n_global_initiatives": 0,
    "has_ideas": true,
    "has_artifacts": false,
    "n_ideas": 12,
    "n_legislation": 0,
    "n_artifacts": 0,
    "n_kpi_targets": 0,
    "n_kpi_results": 0,
    "n_outcomes": 0,
    "verified_own_data": false
  },
  "strategy_profile": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "confidence": "low",
    "summary": "",
    "official_site_url": "http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/",
    "source_documents": [],
    "purpose": null,
    "vision": null,
    "strategic_priorities": [],
    "values": [],
    "outcomes": [],
    "performance_measures": [],
    "document_alignment_terms": {
      "must_support": [],
      "watch_terms": [],
      "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": []
    },
    "review_note": "Only low-confidence webpage, media, contact, news, or global-intelligence evidence is available."
  },
  "global_initiatives": null,
  "strategy": null,
  "ideas": [
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting",
      "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.",
      "quote": "Document\nPDF\nAccessible format\nDate of effect\nCommon Protocol - Informing notifiers about the reasons for National Board decisions\nPDF\n(91.8KB)\nWord version\n(58.5 KB,DOCX)\n1 August 2018\nExemptions from continuing professional development for nurses and midwives\nPDF\n(114KB)\nWeb page\nFrom 1 June 2016\nCurrent:\nPolicy: Re-entry to practice\nPDF\n(354 KB)\nWeb page\n11 February 2019\nRetired:\nPolicy: Re-entry to practice\nPDF\n(316KB)\nFrom 1 September 2015 To 10 February 2019\nMothercraft nurses policy\nPDF\n(45.0KB)\nWeb page\n24 August 2017\nPolicy directions\nUnder Section 11 of the National Law, as in force in each state and territory, the Ministerial Council may issue a National Board with policy directions.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__03.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Policies.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops",
      "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.",
      "quote": "Document\nPDF\nAccessible format\nDate of effect\nCommon Protocol - Informing notifiers about the reasons for National Board decisions\nPDF\n(91.8KB)\nWord version\n(58.5 KB,DOCX)\n1 August 2018\nExemptions from continuing professional development for nurses and midwives\nPDF\n(114KB)\nWeb page\nFrom 1 June 2016\nCurrent:\nPolicy: Re-entry to practice\nPDF\n(354 KB)\nWeb page\n11 February 2019\nRetired:\nPolicy: Re-entry to practice\nPDF\n(316KB)\nFrom 1 September 2015 To 10 February 2019\nMothercraft nurses policy\nPDF\n(45.0KB)\nWeb page\n24 August 2017\nPolicy directions\nUnder Section 11 of the National Law, as in force in each state and territory, the Ministerial Council may issue a National Board with policy directions.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__03.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Policies.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners",
      "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.",
      "quote": "The midwife:\n5.1\ninterprets assessment data and best available evidence to develop a plan for practice\n5.2\ncollaboratively develops plans until options, priorities, goals, actions, anticipated outcomes and timeframes are agreed with the woman, and/or relevant others\n5.3\nco-ordinates resources effectively and efficiently for planned actions, and\n5.4\ndocuments, evaluates and modifies plans to facilitate the anticipated outcomes.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__17.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/Midwife-standards-for-practice.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact",
      "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "The midwife:\n5.1\ninterprets assessment data and best available evidence to develop a plan for practice\n5.2\ncollaboratively develops plans until options, priorities, goals, actions, anticipated outcomes and timeframes are agreed with the woman, and/or relevant others\n5.3\nco-ordinates resources effectively and efficiently for planned actions, and\n5.4\ndocuments, evaluates and modifies plans to facilitate the anticipated outcomes.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__17.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/Midwife-standards-for-practice.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Case Processing",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases",
      "idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.",
      "quote": "The registered nurse:\n4.1\nconducts assessments that are holistic as well as culturally appropriate\n4.2\nuses a range of assessment techniques to systematically collect relevant and accurate information and data to inform practice\n4.3\nworks in partnership to determine factors that affect, or potentially affect, the health and wellbeing of people and populations to determine priorities for action and/ or for referral, and\n4.4\nassesses the resources available to inform planning.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__14.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Case Processing",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "End-to-end case processing redesign",
      "idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.",
      "quote": "The registered nurse:\n4.1\nconducts assessments that are holistic as well as culturally appropriate\n4.2\nuses a range of assessment techniques to systematically collect relevant and accurate information and data to inform practice\n4.3\nworks in partnership to determine factors that affect, or potentially affect, the health and wellbeing of people and populations to determine priorities for action and/ or for referral, and\n4.4\nassesses the resources available to inform planning.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__14.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries",
      "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.",
      "quote": "While the practitioner was under close supervision at work, the risk of harm to the public was managed, but now that the practitioner has resigned, there are no controls in place to manage the risk, and they may work somewhere else and not reveal any past issues.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__23.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Codes-Guidelines/Guidelines-for-mandatory-notifications.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system",
      "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.",
      "quote": "While the practitioner was under close supervision at work, the risk of harm to the public was managed, but now that the practitioner has resigned, there are no controls in place to manage the risk, and they may work somewhere else and not reveal any past issues.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__23.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Codes-Guidelines/Guidelines-for-mandatory-notifications.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking",
      "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.",
      "quote": "Document\nPDF\nAccessible format\nDate of effect\nPolicy Direction 2019-01 - Paramountcy of public protection when administering the National Scheme\nPolicy Direction 2019-02 - Requirements to consult with patient safety bodies and health care consumer bodies on every new and revised registration standard, code and guidelines\nPDF\n(2.34MB)\n8 January 2020\nPage reviewed",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__03.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Policies.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Always-on policy participation platform",
      "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.",
      "quote": "Document\nPDF\nAccessible format\nDate of effect\nPolicy Direction 2019-01 - Paramountcy of public protection when administering the National Scheme\nPolicy Direction 2019-02 - Requirements to consult with patient safety bodies and health care consumer bodies on every new and revised registration standard, code and guidelines\nPDF\n(2.34MB)\n8 January 2020\nPage reviewed",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__03.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Policies.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates",
      "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.",
      "quote": "The midwife:\n1.1\nidentifies what is important to women as the foundation for using evidence to promote informed decision-making, participation in care, and self-determination\n1.2\naccesses, analyses, and uses the best available evidence, that includes research findings, for safe, quality midwifery practice\n1.3\nuses health assessment and health education to support birth and reproductive health, and minimise the potential for complications\n1.4\nundertakes ongoing processes of reflection to ensure professional judgements acknowledge how personal culture impacts on practice\n1.5\nsupports access to maternity care for the woman\n1.6\nsupports the development, implementation and evaluation of evidenced-based health initiatives and programs, and\n1.7\nidentifies and promotes the role of midwifery practice and the midwifery profession in influencing better health outcomes for women.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__17.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/Midwife-standards-for-practice.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Single front door for life-event based services",
      "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.",
      "quote": "The midwife:\n1.1\nidentifies what is important to women as the foundation for using evidence to promote informed decision-making, participation in care, and self-determination\n1.2\naccesses, analyses, and uses the best available evidence, that includes research findings, for safe, quality midwifery practice\n1.3\nuses health assessment and health education to support birth and reproductive health, and minimise the potential for complications\n1.4\nundertakes ongoing processes of reflection to ensure professional judgements acknowledge how personal culture impacts on practice\n1.5\nsupports access to maternity care for the woman\n1.6\nsupports the development, implementation and evaluation of evidenced-based health initiatives and programs, and\n1.7\nidentifies and promotes the role of midwifery practice and the midwifery profession in influencing better health outcomes for women.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__17.html (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/Midwife-standards-for-practice.aspx)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "legislation_administered": [],
  "artifacts": [],
  "_meta": {
    "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:13:26+00:00",
    "strategy_brief_meta": null,
    "ideas_manifest": {
      "entity_id": "B-000726",
      "entity_name": "Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia",
      "folder_name": "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia",
      "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:06:03.310418+00:00",
      "idea_count": 12,
      "markdown": "ideas/Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia_ideas.md",
      "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl",
      "inputs": [
        "Nursing-and-Midwifery-Board-of-Australia_strategy-overview.md",
        "strategy-evidence.json",
        "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json"
      ]
    },
    "global_intel_meta": null
  }
}