{
  "entity_id": "B-003235",
  "folder": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
  "name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
  "type": "Statutory Body",
  "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth",
  "portfolio": "Industry, Science and Resources",
  "website": "https://www.business.gov.au/Grants-and-Programs/Cooperative-Research-Centres-CRC-Grants",
  "data_status": "stub",
  "completeness": {
    "has_strategy_brief": false,
    "has_strategy_structured": false,
    "has_vision": false,
    "has_kpi_targets": false,
    "has_kpi_results": false,
    "has_strategy_overview": true,
    "has_legislation_text": true,
    "has_legislation_structured": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_text": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_structured": false,
    "n_global_initiatives": 0,
    "has_ideas": true,
    "has_artifacts": true,
    "n_ideas": 12,
    "n_legislation": 0,
    "n_artifacts": 5,
    "n_kpi_targets": 0,
    "n_kpi_results": 0,
    "n_outcomes": 0,
    "verified_own_data": false
  },
  "strategy_profile": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "confidence": "low",
    "summary": "",
    "official_site_url": "https://www.business.gov.au/Grants-and-Programs/Cooperative-Research-Centres-CRC-Grants",
    "source_documents": [],
    "purpose": null,
    "vision": null,
    "strategic_priorities": [],
    "values": [],
    "outcomes": [],
    "performance_measures": [],
    "document_alignment_terms": {
      "must_support": [],
      "watch_terms": [],
      "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": []
    },
    "review_note": "No current official strategy document has been verified yet."
  },
  "global_initiatives": null,
  "strategy": null,
  "ideas": [
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners",
      "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.",
      "quote": "[Page 4]\nCONTENTS\nPart 1: Summary and recommendations 7\nExecutive Summary 7\nRecommendations 9\nPart 2: Findings against the Terms of Reference 13\nTerm of Reference A 13\nThe CRC model 13\nContinue with a new focus 14\nInternational experience 15\nPrevious programme reviews and findings 16\nNational Commission of Audit 16\nPublic good 17\nLinking to Industry Growth Centres 17\nTerm of Reference B 19\nA new way to engage small to medium enterprises (SMEs) 19\nIndustry driving research 21\nGovernance 21\nIntellectual Property 22\nPrioritising funding 22\nTerm of Reference C 23\nAttracting more industry and research players 25\nFunding arrangements and participant contributions 25\nResearch Culture 25\nIndustry-relevant research training 26\nTerm of Reference D 27\nApplication and selection processes 27\nAdvisory committee 28\nPerformance data 29\nPerformance of existing CRCs 29\nTerm of Reference E 30",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "other-pdfs/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collabor.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collaboration-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=BF8065CED310B63289962C64F5762B74)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact",
      "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "[Page 4]\nCONTENTS\nPart 1: Summary and recommendations 7\nExecutive Summary 7\nRecommendations 9\nPart 2: Findings against the Terms of Reference 13\nTerm of Reference A 13\nThe CRC model 13\nContinue with a new focus 14\nInternational experience 15\nPrevious programme reviews and findings 16\nNational Commission of Audit 16\nPublic good 17\nLinking to Industry Growth Centres 17\nTerm of Reference B 19\nA new way to engage small to medium enterprises (SMEs) 19\nIndustry driving research 21\nGovernance 21\nIntellectual Property 22\nPrioritising funding 22\nTerm of Reference C 23\nAttracting more industry and research players 25\nFunding arrangements and participant contributions 25\nResearch Culture 25\nIndustry-relevant research training 26\nTerm of Reference D 27\nApplication and selection processes 27\nAdvisory committee 28\nPerformance data 29\nPerformance of existing CRCs 29\nTerm of Reference E 30",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "other-pdfs/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collabor.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collaboration-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=BF8065CED310B63289962C64F5762B74)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries",
      "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.",
      "quote": "[Page 16]\nPrevious programme National Commission of Audit\nreviews and findings\nThe review also considered the 2014 National\nCommission of Audit recommendation to\nThe CRC Programme has been examined\nabolish the programme and roll its funding into\nmany times over its 25 years of operation,\nthe ARC Linkage Program.\nmost recently by Howard Partners (2003),\nInsight Economics (2006), Professor Mary The review does not support this\nO’Kane (2008) and The Allen Consulting recommendation.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collabor.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collaboration-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=BF8065CED310B63289962C64F5762B74)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system",
      "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.",
      "quote": "[Page 16]\nPrevious programme National Commission of Audit\nreviews and findings\nThe review also considered the 2014 National\nCommission of Audit recommendation to\nThe CRC Programme has been examined\nabolish the programme and roll its funding into\nmany times over its 25 years of operation,\nthe ARC Linkage Program.\nmost recently by Howard Partners (2003),\nInsight Economics (2006), Professor Mary The review does not support this\nO’Kane (2008) and The Allen Consulting recommendation.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collabor.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collaboration-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=BF8065CED310B63289962C64F5762B74)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases",
      "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.",
      "quote": "Other realised and expected benefits include:\n– Increased return on investment – increased returns on the $1 billion per year R&D investment made\nby the local MTP sector boosting submission success, cost savings, new product launches, health\nbenefits, and profitability.\n– Increased licence income – MTP firms will have stronger evidence of the value of their products and\nR&D projects, increasing the potential for economic inflows through licensing, partnering and third-\nparty investment.\n– Increased capital value of CRC-P partners – successful capital raise due to CRC-P collaboration,\nexpansion into Asia, and platform development.\n– Improved health and well-being – health benefits arising from the increased success of R&D\ninvestments made by the MPT sector.\n– Increased employment – the CRC-P contributed to a doubling in full-time equivalents (FTE)",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=38094F8B1ECF56489122C2F2D315F7CE)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments",
      "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "Other realised and expected benefits include:\n– Increased return on investment – increased returns on the $1 billion per year R&D investment made\nby the local MTP sector boosting submission success, cost savings, new product launches, health\nbenefits, and profitability.\n– Increased licence income – MTP firms will have stronger evidence of the value of their products and\nR&D projects, increasing the potential for economic inflows through licensing, partnering and third-\nparty investment.\n– Increased capital value of CRC-P partners – successful capital raise due to CRC-P collaboration,\nexpansion into Asia, and platform development.\n– Improved health and well-being – health benefits arising from the increased success of R&D\ninvestments made by the MPT sector.\n– Increased employment – the CRC-P contributed to a doubling in full-time equivalents (FTE)",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=38094F8B1ECF56489122C2F2D315F7CE)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Reusable briefing and summary assistant for internal documents",
      "idea": "Create controlled templates for summarising reports, submissions, minutes, and ministerial briefs.",
      "quote": "Treasury Working Paper 2015-01. https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-03/TWP2015-01.pdf\n13 Productivity Commission 2007, Public Support for Science and Innovation, Productivity Commission\nResearch Report. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/science\nCooperative Research Centres Program Impact Evaluation 47",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "other-pdfs/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=38094F8B1ECF56489122C2F2D315F7CE)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Department-wide knowledge and briefing platform",
      "idea": "Build a secure knowledge platform that lets staff search, summarise, and cite approved departmental material.",
      "quote": "Treasury Working Paper 2015-01. https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-03/TWP2015-01.pdf\n13 Productivity Commission 2007, Public Support for Science and Innovation, Productivity Commission\nResearch Report. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/science\nCooperative Research Centres Program Impact Evaluation 47",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "other-pdfs/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=38094F8B1ECF56489122C2F2D315F7CE)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking",
      "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.",
      "quote": "Table 2.1 Previous reviews of the CRC Program\nYear Evaluator Type\n2018 ARTD Consultants Monitoring evaluation; post-\ncommencement evaluation of the\nimplementation of Miles Review\nrecommendations\n2015 Mr David Miles AM Policy review\n2012 Allen Consulting Group Impact evaluation\n2008 Professor Mary O’Kane Program review\n2007 Productivity Commission Research report on science and\ninnovation\n2006 Insight Economics Impact evaluation\n2005 Allen Consulting Group Impact evaluation\n2003 Howard Partners Program review\n2000 Dr Robin Batterham Program review\n1997 Mr David Mortimer AO Program review\n1997 Mr Don Mercer, Professor John Stocker Program review\n1995 Sir Rupert Myers KBE, AO, FTSE Program review\nSource: DISER\nCooperative Research Centres Program Impact Evaluation 13",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=38094F8B1ECF56489122C2F2D315F7CE)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Always-on policy participation platform",
      "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.",
      "quote": "Table 2.1 Previous reviews of the CRC Program\nYear Evaluator Type\n2018 ARTD Consultants Monitoring evaluation; post-\ncommencement evaluation of the\nimplementation of Miles Review\nrecommendations\n2015 Mr David Miles AM Policy review\n2012 Allen Consulting Group Impact evaluation\n2008 Professor Mary O’Kane Program review\n2007 Productivity Commission Research report on science and\ninnovation\n2006 Insight Economics Impact evaluation\n2005 Allen Consulting Group Impact evaluation\n2003 Howard Partners Program review\n2000 Dr Robin Batterham Program review\n1997 Mr David Mortimer AO Program review\n1997 Mr Don Mercer, Professor John Stocker Program review\n1995 Sir Rupert Myers KBE, AO, FTSE Program review\nSource: DISER\nCooperative Research Centres Program Impact Evaluation 13",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf (https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=38094F8B1ECF56489122C2F2D315F7CE)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates",
      "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.",
      "quote": "Use these systems to:\nschedule and send emails\ntarget messages to specific groups or customer types\nmanager subscriber lists\nmeasure how well your email campaigns are working.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/strategies-index__09.html (https://www.business.gov.au/online-and-digital/digital-tools-for-business)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Single front door for life-event based services",
      "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.",
      "quote": "Use these systems to:\nschedule and send emails\ntarget messages to specific groups or customer types\nmanager subscriber lists\nmeasure how well your email campaigns are working.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/strategies-index__09.html (https://www.business.gov.au/online-and-digital/digital-tools-for-business)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "legislation_administered": [],
  "artifacts": [
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": null,
      "url": "https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/cooperative-research-centres-grants-over-time-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=474747BE3222FBC53A576BBEC62926ED",
      "file": "other-pdfs/cooperative-research-centres-grants-over-time-pdf.pdf",
      "bytes": 377159,
      "link_text": "pdf · 0.36 MB"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": null,
      "url": "https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crcp/cooperative-research-centres-program-faq-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=3F4A954AC6047941714853CA50248B53",
      "file": "other-pdfs/cooperative-research-centres-program-faq-pdf.pdf",
      "bytes": 193678,
      "link_text": "pdf · 0.18 MB"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": null,
      "url": "https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/guidelines-on-security-in-the-crc-program-pdf.pdf",
      "file": "other-pdfs/guidelines-on-security-in-the-crc-program-pdf.pdf",
      "bytes": 181008,
      "link_text": "pdf · 0.17 MB"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": null,
      "url": "https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=38094F8B1ECF56489122C2F2D315F7CE",
      "file": "other-pdfs/crc-impact-evaluation-pdf.pdf",
      "bytes": 4078867,
      "link_text": "pdf · 3.89 MB"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": null,
      "url": "https://www.business.gov.au/-/media/grants-and-programs/crc/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collaboration-pdf.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=BF8065CED310B63289962C64F5762B74",
      "file": "other-pdfs/cooperative-research-centres-miles-review-growth-through-innovation-and-collabor.pdf",
      "bytes": 2088672,
      "link_text": "pdf · 1.99 MB"
    }
  ],
  "_meta": {
    "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:13:03+00:00",
    "strategy_brief_meta": null,
    "ideas_manifest": {
      "entity_id": "B-003235",
      "entity_name": "Industry Innovation and Science Australia - Cooperative Research Centres Advisor",
      "folder_name": "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor",
      "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:18.461721+00:00",
      "idea_count": 12,
      "markdown": "ideas/Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor_ideas.md",
      "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl",
      "inputs": [
        "Industry-Innovation-and-Science-Australia-Cooperative-Research-Centres-Advisor_strategy-overview.md",
        "strategy-evidence.json",
        "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json"
      ]
    },
    "global_intel_meta": null
  }
}