{ "entity_id": "B-003035", "folder": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "type": "Statutory Body", "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth", "portfolio": "Attorney-General's", "website": "https://www.inslm.gov.au/", "data_status": "partial", "completeness": { "has_strategy_brief": false, "has_strategy_structured": true, "has_vision": false, "has_kpi_targets": false, "has_kpi_results": false, "has_strategy_overview": true, "has_legislation_text": true, "has_legislation_structured": false, "has_global_initiatives_text": false, "has_global_initiatives_structured": false, "n_global_initiatives": 0, "has_ideas": true, "has_artifacts": true, "n_ideas": 12, "n_legislation": 0, "n_artifacts": 2, "n_kpi_targets": 0, "n_kpi_results": 0, "n_outcomes": 0, "verified_own_data": true }, "strategy_profile": { "status": "needs_review", "confidence": "medium", "summary": "", "official_site_url": "https://www.inslm.gov.au/", "source_documents": [ { "type": "annual_report", "title": "Annual Report", "url": "https://web.archive.org.au/awa/20240317003732mp_/https://www.inslm.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-12/INSLM-annual-report-2022-23.pdf", "period": "2024", "confidence": "high" } ], "purpose": null, "vision": null, "strategic_priorities": [], "values": [], "outcomes": [], "performance_measures": [], "document_alignment_terms": { "must_support": [], "watch_terms": [], "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": [] }, "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete." }, "global_initiatives": null, "strategy": { "reporting_period": "2024-25", "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26", "vision": null, "vision_source_page": null, "purposes": null, "purposes_source_page": null, "how_we_deliver": null, "how_we_deliver_source_page": null, "government_priorities": [], "outcomes": [], "values": [], "values_framework_name": null, "kpi_targets_2025_26": [], "kpi_results_2024_25": [], "_source_urls": { "annual_report_url": "https://web.archive.org.au/awa/20240317003732mp_/https://www.inslm.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-12/INSLM-annual-report-2022-23.pdf", "corporate_plan_url": "" } }, "ideas": [ { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "small", "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries", "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.", "quote": "Issues Paper – Review of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in section 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995\nIssues paper\nPublication date\n11 August 2025\nHearing\nDefining terrorism: Review of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in section 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995\nDownload\nIssues Paper – Review of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in section 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 [PDF]\nThe definition of a ‘terrorist act’ under section 100.1 of the\nCriminal Code Act 1995\n(Cth) (\nCriminal Code\n) is an element of a number of serious offences and enlivens a broad range of policing and other powers under Commonwealth, state and territory laws.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "pages/publications-index.html (https://www.inslm.gov.au/publications/issues-paper-review-definition-terrorist-act-section-1001-criminal-code-act-1995)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "large", "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system", "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.", "quote": "Issues Paper – Review of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in section 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995\nIssues paper\nPublication date\n11 August 2025\nHearing\nDefining terrorism: Review of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in section 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995\nDownload\nIssues Paper – Review of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in section 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 [PDF]\nThe definition of a ‘terrorist act’ under section 100.1 of the\nCriminal Code Act 1995\n(Cth) (\nCriminal Code\n) is an element of a number of serious offences and enlivens a broad range of policing and other powers under Commonwealth, state and territory laws.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "pages/publications-index.html (https://www.inslm.gov.au/publications/issues-paper-review-definition-terrorist-act-section-1001-criminal-code-act-1995)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "small", "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners", "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.", "quote": "Some\nof the reviews also cited the 2003 bombing of the UN Headquarters in Baghdad as a reason for the\ninclusion of ‘international organisations’, or the UN as a target under the definition.208 In 2014 the\nCouncil of Australian Governments (COAG) supported a recommendation to include reference to UN\nentities in the definition to afford them the same protection as Australian and foreign governments,\nnoting:\nSuch recognition is appropriate, given the international governmental functions performed by these\nagencies, and evidence that UN agencies have been the target of terrorist acts abroad.209\n199 UK see Terrorism Act 2000 (UK) s 1; USA see Title 18 US Code §2331; Canada see Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "large", "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact", "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "Some\nof the reviews also cited the 2003 bombing of the UN Headquarters in Baghdad as a reason for the\ninclusion of ‘international organisations’, or the UN as a target under the definition.208 In 2014 the\nCouncil of Australian Governments (COAG) supported a recommendation to include reference to UN\nentities in the definition to afford them the same protection as Australian and foreign governments,\nnoting:\nSuch recognition is appropriate, given the international governmental functions performed by these\nagencies, and evidence that UN agencies have been the target of terrorist acts abroad.209\n199 UK see Terrorism Act 2000 (UK) s 1; USA see Title 18 US Code §2331; Canada see Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "small", "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates", "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.", "quote": "The agencies said they were ‘increasingly concerned’ about this issue, noting\nthat radicalised minors can pose the ‘same credible terrorist threat as adults’ and the involvement of\nminors in violent extremist activities can have ‘lifelong consequences’.90 The paper noted that violent\nextremist content is ‘more accessible’, with violent extremists ‘adopt[ing] the internet as a vector for\ntheir activities’ through ‘seemingly innocuous social media and gaming platforms’.91\n2.22 In his 2025 Annual Threat Assessment the Director-General noted that in the next 5 years, ‘a\ngeneration of digital natives…[will] enter a vulnerable age for radicalisation.’92 He elaborated:\nFor some, their sense of normality, identity and community will be more influenced by the online\nworld than the real world.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "large", "title": "Single front door for life-event based services", "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.", "quote": "The agencies said they were ‘increasingly concerned’ about this issue, noting\nthat radicalised minors can pose the ‘same credible terrorist threat as adults’ and the involvement of\nminors in violent extremist activities can have ‘lifelong consequences’.90 The paper noted that violent\nextremist content is ‘more accessible’, with violent extremists ‘adopt[ing] the internet as a vector for\ntheir activities’ through ‘seemingly innocuous social media and gaming platforms’.91\n2.22 In his 2025 Annual Threat Assessment the Director-General noted that in the next 5 years, ‘a\ngeneration of digital natives…[will] enter a vulnerable age for radicalisation.’92 He elaborated:\nFor some, their sense of normality, identity and community will be more influenced by the online\nworld than the real world.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "small", "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting", "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.", "quote": "[pages 1,2,3]\n[Page 1]\nIndependent National Security\nLegislation Monitor\nDefining\nTerrorism\nIssues Paper\nReview of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in\nsection 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "large", "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops", "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.", "quote": "[pages 1,2,3]\n[Page 1]\nIndependent National Security\nLegislation Monitor\nDefining\nTerrorism\nIssues Paper\nReview of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in\nsection 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Citizen Participation", "scale": "small", "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking", "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.", "quote": "The agencies said they were ‘increasingly concerned’ about this issue, noting\nthat radicalised minors can pose the ‘same credible terrorist threat as adults’ and the involvement of\nminors in violent extremist activities can have ‘lifelong consequences’.90 The paper noted that violent\nextremist content is ‘more accessible’, with violent extremists ‘adopt[ing] the internet as a vector for\ntheir activities’ through ‘seemingly innocuous social media and gaming platforms’.91\n2.22 In his 2025 Annual Threat Assessment the Director-General noted that in the next 5 years, ‘a\ngeneration of digital natives…[will] enter a vulnerable age for radicalisation.’92 He elaborated:\nFor some, their sense of normality, identity and community will be more influenced by the online\nworld than the real world.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Citizen Participation", "scale": "large", "title": "Always-on policy participation platform", "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.", "quote": "The agencies said they were ‘increasingly concerned’ about this issue, noting\nthat radicalised minors can pose the ‘same credible terrorist threat as adults’ and the involvement of\nminors in violent extremist activities can have ‘lifelong consequences’.90 The paper noted that violent\nextremist content is ‘more accessible’, with violent extremists ‘adopt[ing] the internet as a vector for\ntheir activities’ through ‘seemingly innocuous social media and gaming platforms’.91\n2.22 In his 2025 Annual Threat Assessment the Director-General noted that in the next 5 years, ‘a\ngeneration of digital natives…[will] enter a vulnerable age for radicalisation.’92 He elaborated:\nFor some, their sense of normality, identity and community will be more influenced by the online\nworld than the real world.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "small", "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases", "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.", "quote": "Resolution 2341 does not define what ‘critical infrastructure’ is, stating\nthat ‘each State determines what constitutes its critical infrastructure’.282 The UN Office of Counter-\nTerrorism and the UN Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate have issued a compendium\nof good practice in relation to the protection of critical infrastructure against terrorist attacks and while\nthey note countries are left with significant discretion in choosing the criteria for identifying which\ninfrastructure satisfies the ‘criticality’ threshold, they have provided some guidance of best practice:\n[critical infrastructure] can be defined, among others, by taking into account the role they play in the\npromotion and protection of human rights (for example, infrastructure that is vital for the functioning\nof healthcare delivery systems; emergency service systems, water and wastewater systems, etc.)", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "large", "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments", "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "Resolution 2341 does not define what ‘critical infrastructure’ is, stating\nthat ‘each State determines what constitutes its critical infrastructure’.282 The UN Office of Counter-\nTerrorism and the UN Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate have issued a compendium\nof good practice in relation to the protection of critical infrastructure against terrorist attacks and while\nthey note countries are left with significant discretion in choosing the criteria for identifying which\ninfrastructure satisfies the ‘criticality’ threshold, they have provided some guidance of best practice:\n[critical infrastructure] can be defined, among others, by taking into account the role they play in the\npromotion and protection of human rights (for example, infrastructure that is vital for the functioning\nof healthcare delivery systems; emergency service systems, water and wastewater systems, etc.)", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf (https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] } ], "legislation_administered": [], "artifacts": [ { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2025", "url": "https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf", "bytes": 19548209, "link_text": "Issues Paper – Review of the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in section 100.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 [PDF]" }, { "category": "annual-reports", "year": "2024", "url": "https://web.archive.org.au/awa/20240317003732mp_/https://www.inslm.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-12/INSLM-annual-report-2022-23.pdf", "file": "annual-reports/2024.pdf", "bytes": 1052731, "link_text": "Annual Report" } ], "_meta": { "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:13:01+00:00", "strategy_brief_meta": { "model": "nova-micro", "folder": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "annual_report": { "file": null, "url": "", "year": null }, "corporate_plan": { "file": "other-pdfs\\INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.txt", "url": "https://www.inslm.gov.au/system/files/2025-08/INSLM-terrorism-Issues-Paper.pdf", "year": null }, "usage": { "input_tokens": 12052, "output_tokens": 155, "total_tokens": 12207, "model": "nova-micro" }, "cost_usd": 0.00044352000000000004, "elapsed_seconds": 1.89, "generated_at": "2026-05-13T10:33:31+00:00" }, "ideas_manifest": { "entity_id": "B-003035", "entity_name": "Independent National Security Legislation Monitor", "folder_name": "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor", "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:24.530148+00:00", "idea_count": 12, "markdown": "ideas/Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor_ideas.md", "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl", "inputs": [ "Independent-National-Security-Legislation-Monitor_strategy-overview.md", "strategy-evidence.json", "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json" ] }, "global_intel_meta": null } }