{
  "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
  "folder": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
  "name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
  "type": "Independent Statutory Authority",
  "jurisdiction": "NSW",
  "portfolio": "",
  "website": "https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/",
  "data_status": "stub",
  "completeness": {
    "has_strategy_brief": false,
    "has_strategy_structured": false,
    "has_vision": false,
    "has_kpi_targets": false,
    "has_kpi_results": false,
    "has_strategy_overview": true,
    "has_legislation_text": true,
    "has_legislation_structured": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_text": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_structured": false,
    "n_global_initiatives": 0,
    "has_ideas": true,
    "has_artifacts": false,
    "n_ideas": 12,
    "n_legislation": 0,
    "n_artifacts": 0,
    "n_kpi_targets": 0,
    "n_kpi_results": 0,
    "n_outcomes": 0,
    "verified_own_data": false
  },
  "strategy_profile": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "confidence": "low",
    "summary": "",
    "official_site_url": "https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/",
    "source_documents": [],
    "purpose": null,
    "vision": null,
    "strategic_priorities": [],
    "values": [],
    "outcomes": [],
    "performance_measures": [],
    "document_alignment_terms": {
      "must_support": [],
      "watch_terms": [],
      "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": []
    },
    "review_note": "Only low-confidence webpage, media, contact, news, or global-intelligence evidence is available."
  },
  "global_initiatives": null,
  "strategy": null,
  "ideas": [
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases",
      "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.",
      "quote": "Consider the following measures:\nmaintain records of all outside employment applications and approvals, including the projected hours of work\nregularly remind employees of their statutory obligations in relation to outside employment\nregularly audit the attendance records of all employees granted permission to undertake outside employment\nrestrict or prohibit outside employment for employees in certain high corruption-risk positions, such as procurement and contract management, commensurate with the risks of corruption\ndesign a process for consulting centralised outside employment records when procurement or recruitment panels are being convened to ensure that employees with related interests are not members of panels\ninform relevant contractors to the agency about outside employment restrictions on agency employees",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "pages/strategies-index.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/prevention/basic-standards/outside-employment/developing-a-strategy)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments",
      "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "Consider the following measures:\nmaintain records of all outside employment applications and approvals, including the projected hours of work\nregularly remind employees of their statutory obligations in relation to outside employment\nregularly audit the attendance records of all employees granted permission to undertake outside employment\nrestrict or prohibit outside employment for employees in certain high corruption-risk positions, such as procurement and contract management, commensurate with the risks of corruption\ndesign a process for consulting centralised outside employment records when procurement or recruitment panels are being convened to ensure that employees with related interests are not members of panels\ninform relevant contractors to the agency about outside employment restrictions on agency employees",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "pages/strategies-index.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/prevention/basic-standards/outside-employment/developing-a-strategy)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries",
      "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.",
      "quote": "Recommendation 9\nThat the DPE:\nconducts regular risk-based audits of planning agreements negotiated by councils\nestablishes guidelines for conducting risk-based audits\npublishes audit outcomes\nuses the outcomes from audits to improve the processes and procedures governing negotiation and execution of planning agreements.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__22.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2023/hurstville-city-council-georges-river-council-operation-galley)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system",
      "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.",
      "quote": "Recommendation 9\nThat the DPE:\nconducts regular risk-based audits of planning agreements negotiated by councils\nestablishes guidelines for conducting risk-based audits\npublishes audit outcomes\nuses the outcomes from audits to improve the processes and procedures governing negotiation and execution of planning agreements.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__22.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2023/hurstville-city-council-georges-river-council-operation-galley)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Reusable briefing and summary assistant for internal documents",
      "idea": "Create controlled templates for summarising reports, submissions, minutes, and ministerial briefs.",
      "quote": "You are here:\nHome\nInvestigations\nPast investigations\n2026\nSchool Infrastructure NSW – Operation Landan\nSchool Infrastructure NSW – allegations concerning former chief executive, staff and others (Operation Landan)\nYear\n: 2026\nStatus\n: Completed\nBack to investigations\nPrint page\nThe ICAC investigated allegations concerning:\nWhether, between 2017 and about 2024, School Infrastructure NSW (SINSW) chief executive Anthony Manning and other SINSW staff or contractors partially exercised their official functions by:\nintentionally subverting appropriate recruitment practices to benefit friends and business associates\nimproperly awarding contracts to friends and business associates\nmisallocating funds from school projects to favour particular businesses and to fund consultancy positions for friends and business associates.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__16.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2026/school-infrastructure-nsw---operation-landan)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Department-wide knowledge and briefing platform",
      "idea": "Build a secure knowledge platform that lets staff search, summarise, and cite approved departmental material.",
      "quote": "You are here:\nHome\nInvestigations\nPast investigations\n2026\nSchool Infrastructure NSW – Operation Landan\nSchool Infrastructure NSW – allegations concerning former chief executive, staff and others (Operation Landan)\nYear\n: 2026\nStatus\n: Completed\nBack to investigations\nPrint page\nThe ICAC investigated allegations concerning:\nWhether, between 2017 and about 2024, School Infrastructure NSW (SINSW) chief executive Anthony Manning and other SINSW staff or contractors partially exercised their official functions by:\nintentionally subverting appropriate recruitment practices to benefit friends and business associates\nimproperly awarding contracts to friends and business associates\nmisallocating funds from school projects to favour particular businesses and to fund consultancy positions for friends and business associates.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__16.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2026/school-infrastructure-nsw---operation-landan)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates",
      "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.",
      "quote": "You are here:\nHome\nInvestigations\nPast investigations\n2023\nRoads and Maritime Services – Operation Paragon\nRoads and Maritime Services – allegation concerning two former employees (Operation Paragon)\nYear\n: 2023\nStatus\n: Completed\nBack to investigations\nPrint page\nThe ICAC investigated an allegation that, between 2009 and June 2019, then Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) employees Alexandre Dubois and Craig Steyn partially and/or dishonestly exercised their official functions by awarding in excess of $41 million in RMS contracts, to companies with which they were associated, in exchange for receiving benefits.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__24.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2023/roads-and-maritime-services---operation-paragon)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Single front door for life-event based services",
      "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.",
      "quote": "You are here:\nHome\nInvestigations\nPast investigations\n2023\nRoads and Maritime Services – Operation Paragon\nRoads and Maritime Services – allegation concerning two former employees (Operation Paragon)\nYear\n: 2023\nStatus\n: Completed\nBack to investigations\nPrint page\nThe ICAC investigated an allegation that, between 2009 and June 2019, then Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) employees Alexandre Dubois and Craig Steyn partially and/or dishonestly exercised their official functions by awarding in excess of $41 million in RMS contracts, to companies with which they were associated, in exchange for receiving benefits.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__24.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2023/roads-and-maritime-services---operation-paragon)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking",
      "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.",
      "quote": "Resources from the public inquiry\nView the\nOperation Mantis submissions timetable\nDownload the\nWitness Liaison Officer brochure (pdf)\nDownload the\nOperation Mantis media guidelines (pdf)\nFull report\nMedia release\nVideo\nFact sheet\nFindings of corrupt conduct\nThe ICAC has found that Benjamin Webb engaged in corrupt conduct by, between 1 January 2021 and 9 December 2022:\nmisusing his public official functions as Canterbury-Bankstown Council’s (Council) manager of works and projects to facilitate the engagement of contingent workers through PMLV Invest and Const Pty Ltd (PMLV), a company run by his friend, Mr Cossu, by approving their engagement and/or determining to add more workers to Council’s Works and Projects Unit, in return for which he received approximately $208,000 during the period that he worked at Council",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__19.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2024/canterbury-bankstown-council-operation-mantis)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Always-on policy participation platform",
      "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.",
      "quote": "Resources from the public inquiry\nView the\nOperation Mantis submissions timetable\nDownload the\nWitness Liaison Officer brochure (pdf)\nDownload the\nOperation Mantis media guidelines (pdf)\nFull report\nMedia release\nVideo\nFact sheet\nFindings of corrupt conduct\nThe ICAC has found that Benjamin Webb engaged in corrupt conduct by, between 1 January 2021 and 9 December 2022:\nmisusing his public official functions as Canterbury-Bankstown Council’s (Council) manager of works and projects to facilitate the engagement of contingent workers through PMLV Invest and Const Pty Ltd (PMLV), a company run by his friend, Mr Cossu, by approving their engagement and/or determining to add more workers to Council’s Works and Projects Unit, in return for which he received approximately $208,000 during the period that he worked at Council",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__19.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2024/canterbury-bankstown-council-operation-mantis)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners",
      "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.",
      "quote": "Recommendation 9\nThat the DPE:\nconducts regular risk-based audits of planning agreements negotiated by councils\nestablishes guidelines for conducting risk-based audits\npublishes audit outcomes\nuses the outcomes from audits to improve the processes and procedures governing negotiation and execution of planning agreements.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__22.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2023/hurstville-city-council-georges-river-council-operation-galley)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact",
      "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "Recommendation 9\nThat the DPE:\nconducts regular risk-based audits of planning agreements negotiated by councils\nestablishes guidelines for conducting risk-based audits\npublishes audit outcomes\nuses the outcomes from audits to improve the processes and procedures governing negotiation and execution of planning agreements.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "pages/media-releases-index__22.html (https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2023/hurstville-city-council-georges-river-council-operation-galley)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "legislation_administered": [],
  "artifacts": [],
  "_meta": {
    "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:13:00+00:00",
    "strategy_brief_meta": null,
    "ideas_manifest": {
      "entity_id": "S-NSW-071",
      "entity_name": "Independent Commission Against Corruption",
      "folder_name": "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption",
      "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:06:08.015082+00:00",
      "idea_count": 12,
      "markdown": "ideas/Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption_ideas.md",
      "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl",
      "inputs": [
        "Independent-Commission-Against-Corruption_strategy-overview.md",
        "strategy-evidence.json",
        "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json"
      ]
    },
    "global_intel_meta": null
  }
}