{
  "entity_id": "B-000603",
  "folder": "Family-Law-Council",
  "name": "Family Law Council",
  "type": "Statutory Body",
  "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth",
  "portfolio": "Attorney-General's",
  "website": "http://www.ag.gov.au/FamiliesAndMarriage/FamilyLawCouncil/Pages/default.aspx",
  "data_status": "partial",
  "completeness": {
    "has_strategy_brief": true,
    "has_strategy_structured": true,
    "has_vision": false,
    "has_kpi_targets": true,
    "has_kpi_results": true,
    "has_strategy_overview": true,
    "has_legislation_text": true,
    "has_legislation_structured": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_text": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_structured": false,
    "n_global_initiatives": 0,
    "has_ideas": true,
    "has_artifacts": true,
    "n_ideas": 12,
    "n_legislation": 0,
    "n_artifacts": 8,
    "n_kpi_targets": 3,
    "n_kpi_results": 3,
    "n_outcomes": 2,
    "verified_own_data": true
  },
  "strategy_profile": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "summary": "The overall objective for CCSs is to provide children with the opportunity of re-establishing or maintaining a meaningful relationship with both parents, and other significant persons in their lives, when considered safe to do so.",
    "official_site_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/FamiliesAndMarriage/FamilyLawCouncil/Pages/default.aspx",
    "source_documents": [
      {
        "type": "strategie",
        "title": "Guiding Principles Framework for Good Practice",
        "url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "period": "2020",
        "confidence": "medium"
      }
    ],
    "purpose": {
      "text": "The overall objective for CCSs is to provide children with the opportunity of re-establishing or maintaining a meaningful relationship with both parents, and other significant persons in their lives, when considered safe to do so.",
      "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
      "source_page": 3,
      "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=3"
    },
    "vision": null,
    "strategic_priorities": [
      {
        "title": "Facilitated Changeover",
        "description": "Facilitated Changeover",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      },
      {
        "title": "Supervised Visit",
        "description": "Supervised Visit",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      },
      {
        "title": "Off-Site Supervision",
        "description": "Off-Site Supervision",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      },
      {
        "title": "Supported/Monitored Visits",
        "description": "Supported/Monitored Visits",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      },
      {
        "title": "Telephone/Internet Based Supervision",
        "description": "Telephone/Internet Based Supervision",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      },
      {
        "title": "Unsupervised On Site Visit",
        "description": "Unsupervised On Site Visit",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      },
      {
        "title": "Reports for Court",
        "description": "Reports for Court",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      },
      {
        "title": "Information and Referrals",
        "description": "Information and Referrals",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 7,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=7"
      }
    ],
    "values": [
      {
        "name": "Child Focussed",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Safety",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Neutrality",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Client diversity and cultural sensitivity",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Collaborative Service System",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      }
    ],
    "outcomes": [
      {
        "name": "Outcome 1: Safety and Security",
        "description": "The safety of all who visit or work at a CCS is of paramount importance. CCSs develop a Safety and Security Plan which addresses safety risks across all relevant aspects of service delivery, taking into account the type of services delivered, the client population being serviced and factors relevant to the particular CCS.",
        "activities": [
          "Safety and Security Plan",
          "Staff checks",
          "Safety Policies and Procedures for staff",
          "Reporting of critical incidents"
        ],
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 9,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=9"
      },
      {
        "name": "Outcome 2: Service Delivery",
        "description": "CCSs provide integrated services as part of the broader family law system and work in collaboration with other services and the community.",
        "activities": [
          "Intake, screening and assessment",
          "Communication",
          "Family Relationships Online (FRO)"
        ],
        "source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "source_page": 5,
        "source_deep_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf#page=5"
      }
    ],
    "performance_measures": [
      {
        "code": "CCS01",
        "measure": "Number of facilitated changeovers",
        "target": "Increase by 10%",
        "latest_result": "95% achieved",
        "status": "Achieved",
        "target_source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "target_source_page": null,
        "result_source_url": "",
        "result_source_page": null
      },
      {
        "code": "CCS02",
        "measure": "Number of supervised visits",
        "target": "Increase by 10%",
        "latest_result": "90% achieved",
        "status": "Achieved",
        "target_source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "target_source_page": null,
        "result_source_url": "",
        "result_source_page": null
      },
      {
        "code": "CCS03",
        "measure": "Number of off-site supervisions",
        "target": "Increase by 10%",
        "latest_result": "85% achieved",
        "status": "Achieved",
        "target_source_url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "target_source_page": null,
        "result_source_url": "",
        "result_source_page": null
      }
    ],
    "document_alignment_terms": {
      "must_support": [
        "The overall objective for CCSs is to provide children with the opportunity of re-establishing or maintaining a meaningful relationship with both parents, and other significant pers",
        "Facilitated Changeover",
        "Supervised Visit",
        "Off-Site Supervision",
        "Supported/Monitored Visits",
        "Telephone/Internet Based Supervision",
        "Unsupervised On Site Visit",
        "Reports for Court",
        "Information and Referrals"
      ],
      "watch_terms": [
        "Number of facilitated changeovers",
        "Number of supervised visits",
        "Number of off-site supervisions"
      ],
      "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": []
    },
    "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete."
  },
  "global_initiatives": null,
  "strategy": {
    "reporting_period": "2024-25",
    "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26",
    "vision": null,
    "vision_source_page": null,
    "purposes": "The overall objective for CCSs is to provide children with the opportunity of re-establishing or maintaining a meaningful relationship with both parents, and other significant persons in their lives, when considered safe to do so.",
    "purposes_source_page": 3,
    "how_we_deliver": "CCSs enable children of separated parents to have safe contact with the parent they do not live with, in circumstances where parents are unable to manage their own contact arrangements. Where separated parents are not able to meet without conflict, CCSs provide a safe, neutral venue for the transfer of children between separated parents. Where there is a perceived or actual risk to the child, they provide supervised contact between a child and their parent or other family member.",
    "how_we_deliver_source_page": 3,
    "government_priorities": [
      {
        "text": "Facilitated Changeover",
        "source_page": 7
      },
      {
        "text": "Supervised Visit",
        "source_page": 7
      },
      {
        "text": "Off-Site Supervision",
        "source_page": 7
      },
      {
        "text": "Supported/Monitored Visits",
        "source_page": 7
      },
      {
        "text": "Telephone/Internet Based Supervision",
        "source_page": 7
      },
      {
        "text": "Unsupervised On Site Visit",
        "source_page": 7
      },
      {
        "text": "Reports for Court",
        "source_page": 7
      },
      {
        "text": "Information and Referrals",
        "source_page": 7
      }
    ],
    "outcomes": [
      {
        "name": "Outcome 1: Safety and Security",
        "description": "The safety of all who visit or work at a CCS is of paramount importance. CCSs develop a Safety and Security Plan which addresses safety risks across all relevant aspects of service delivery, taking into account the type of services delivered, the client population being serviced and factors relevant to the particular CCS.",
        "key_activities": [
          "Safety and Security Plan",
          "Staff checks",
          "Safety Policies and Procedures for staff",
          "Reporting of critical incidents"
        ],
        "source_page": 9
      },
      {
        "name": "Outcome 2: Service Delivery",
        "description": "CCSs provide integrated services as part of the broader family law system and work in collaboration with other services and the community.",
        "key_activities": [
          "Intake, screening and assessment",
          "Communication",
          "Family Relationships Online (FRO)"
        ],
        "source_page": 5
      }
    ],
    "values": [
      "Child Focussed",
      "Safety",
      "Neutrality",
      "Client diversity and cultural sensitivity",
      "Collaborative Service System"
    ],
    "values_framework_name": null,
    "kpi_targets_2025_26": [
      {
        "code": "CCS01",
        "measure": "Number of facilitated changeovers",
        "target": "Increase by 10%",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "code": "CCS02",
        "measure": "Number of supervised visits",
        "target": "Increase by 10%",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "code": "CCS03",
        "measure": "Number of off-site supervisions",
        "target": "Increase by 10%",
        "source_page": null
      }
    ],
    "kpi_results_2024_25": [
      {
        "code": "CCS01",
        "measure": "Number of facilitated changeovers",
        "result": "95% achieved",
        "status": "Achieved",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "code": "CCS02",
        "measure": "Number of supervised visits",
        "result": "90% achieved",
        "status": "Achieved",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "code": "CCS03",
        "measure": "Number of off-site supervisions",
        "result": "85% achieved",
        "status": "Achieved",
        "source_page": null
      }
    ],
    "_source_urls": {
      "annual_report_url": "",
      "corporate_plan_url": ""
    }
  },
  "ideas": [
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries",
      "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.",
      "quote": "The Family Law System in Context 69\nThe Hon Professor Chisholm AM – Family Courts Violence Review (2009)\n2.52 In 2009, the Hon Professor Chisholm AM reviewed ‘the appropriateness of the\nlegislation practices and procedures in relation to matters before the federal family courts\nwhere issues of family violence arise’.86\n2.53 Chisholm observed that ‘[t]here are few more difficult or more important\nchallenges for the family law system than dealing with cases where family violence is\nan issue.’87\n2.54 Recommendations from this report included:\ny legislative amendments to mandate an initial risk identification and assessment\nby the court;88\ny a review of the funding available to a range of actors in the family law system to\nmaximise their ability to reduce the risk of family violence;89 and\ny measures to improve the understanding of family violence among family law",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "reviews/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf (https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system",
      "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.",
      "quote": "The Family Law System in Context 69\nThe Hon Professor Chisholm AM – Family Courts Violence Review (2009)\n2.52 In 2009, the Hon Professor Chisholm AM reviewed ‘the appropriateness of the\nlegislation practices and procedures in relation to matters before the federal family courts\nwhere issues of family violence arise’.86\n2.53 Chisholm observed that ‘[t]here are few more difficult or more important\nchallenges for the family law system than dealing with cases where family violence is\nan issue.’87\n2.54 Recommendations from this report included:\ny legislative amendments to mandate an initial risk identification and assessment\nby the court;88\ny a review of the funding available to a range of actors in the family law system to\nmaximise their ability to reduce the risk of family violence;89 and\ny measures to improve the understanding of family violence among family law",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "reviews/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf (https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates",
      "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.",
      "quote": "CCS practitioner\n(Staff/volunteers supervising children and families alone)\nNo requirement – organisation assesses that individual has suitable work Successfully completed at least 4 subjects of a grad dip or cert IV or 4 subjects\nexperience to safely provide services. of a related degree, with demonstrated progress towards completion of the\nqualification within 3 years from date of application; and\nA minimum 130 hours experience in supervised service provision in a CCS or\nequivalent service; OR\nCertificate IV in related disciplines with minimum 75 hours of supervised service Certificate IV in related disciplines with minimum 100 hours of supervised\nprovision in a CCS or equivalent service; OR service provision in a CCS or equivalent service; OR",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "other-pdfs/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf (https://consultations.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/establishment-of-an-accreditation-scheme-for-ccs/user_uploads/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Single front door for life-event based services",
      "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.",
      "quote": "CCS practitioner\n(Staff/volunteers supervising children and families alone)\nNo requirement – organisation assesses that individual has suitable work Successfully completed at least 4 subjects of a grad dip or cert IV or 4 subjects\nexperience to safely provide services. of a related degree, with demonstrated progress towards completion of the\nqualification within 3 years from date of application; and\nA minimum 130 hours experience in supervised service provision in a CCS or\nequivalent service; OR\nCertificate IV in related disciplines with minimum 75 hours of supervised service Certificate IV in related disciplines with minimum 100 hours of supervised\nprovision in a CCS or equivalent service; OR service provision in a CCS or equivalent service; OR",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "other-pdfs/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf (https://consultations.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/establishment-of-an-accreditation-scheme-for-ccs/user_uploads/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Reusable briefing and summary assistant for internal documents",
      "idea": "Create controlled templates for summarising reports, submissions, minutes, and ministerial briefs.",
      "quote": "More expensive staffing profile for the conduct of Option 3 - Assuming Y1-2 only 5% of sessions would Not applicable Low scenario: $18,400,000 Low scenario:\ncontact sessions (increased mandatory staffing ratios) require additional staff to be allocated to meet mandatory High scenario: $30,200,000 High scenario:\nstaffing ratios (the majority of double staff sessions\nUnable to cost differential impact of Option\ncovered by additional supervision for staff uplifting\n3 vs Option 4 as the costing model is based\nqualifications), at an AWE cost for a session duration of 2\non AWE\nhours.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "other-pdfs/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf (https://consultations.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/establishment-of-an-accreditation-scheme-for-ccs/user_uploads/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Department-wide knowledge and briefing platform",
      "idea": "Build a secure knowledge platform that lets staff search, summarise, and cite approved departmental material.",
      "quote": "More expensive staffing profile for the conduct of Option 3 - Assuming Y1-2 only 5% of sessions would Not applicable Low scenario: $18,400,000 Low scenario:\ncontact sessions (increased mandatory staffing ratios) require additional staff to be allocated to meet mandatory High scenario: $30,200,000 High scenario:\nstaffing ratios (the majority of double staff sessions\nUnable to cost differential impact of Option\ncovered by additional supervision for staff uplifting\n3 vs Option 4 as the costing model is based\nqualifications), at an AWE cost for a session duration of 2\non AWE\nhours.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "other-pdfs/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf (https://consultations.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/establishment-of-an-accreditation-scheme-for-ccs/user_uploads/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting",
      "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.",
      "quote": "Regulatory burden estimate (RBE) table\nThe status quo option is estimated to result in the following regulatory costs to the sector:\nForecast annual regulatory costs\nChange in costs ($ million) Individuals Business Community organisations Total change in cost\nTotal, by sector $0 $0 $0 $0\nATTORNEY-GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT | Establishment of an Accreditation Scheme for Children’s Contact Services 17",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf (https://consultations.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/establishment-of-an-accreditation-scheme-for-ccs/user_uploads/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops",
      "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.",
      "quote": "Regulatory burden estimate (RBE) table\nThe status quo option is estimated to result in the following regulatory costs to the sector:\nForecast annual regulatory costs\nChange in costs ($ million) Individuals Business Community organisations Total change in cost\nTotal, by sector $0 $0 $0 $0\nATTORNEY-GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT | Establishment of an Accreditation Scheme for Children’s Contact Services 17",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf (https://consultations.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/establishment-of-an-accreditation-scheme-for-ccs/user_uploads/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Case Processing",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases",
      "idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.",
      "quote": "[Page 70]\nChapter 44 Australian Security Intelligence Organisation security Volume 4\nassessments\ninformation contained in the assessment, and agencies must proceed on the basis\nof those findings.182\n44.20 The ASIO Act contains two key prohibitions in relation to security assessments:\n it prohibits a Commonwealth agency from taking prescribed administrative\naction on the basis of any communication made by ASIO in relation to a\nperson which does not amount to a security assessment,183 and\n it prohibits ASIO from making any communication to a state, which it knows\nis intended or likely to be used by that state in considering prescribed\nadministrative action against a person, except in the form of a security\nassessment.184\n44.21 In other words, the ASIO Act does not prevent ASIO from communicating security\nadvice in situations where prescribed administrative action may result.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/volume-4-accountability-and-transparency-annexes.pdf (https://www.ag.gov.au/system/files/2020-12/volume-4-accountability-and-transparency-annexes.PDF)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Case Processing",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "End-to-end case processing redesign",
      "idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.",
      "quote": "[Page 70]\nChapter 44 Australian Security Intelligence Organisation security Volume 4\nassessments\ninformation contained in the assessment, and agencies must proceed on the basis\nof those findings.182\n44.20 The ASIO Act contains two key prohibitions in relation to security assessments:\n it prohibits a Commonwealth agency from taking prescribed administrative\naction on the basis of any communication made by ASIO in relation to a\nperson which does not amount to a security assessment,183 and\n it prohibits ASIO from making any communication to a state, which it knows\nis intended or likely to be used by that state in considering prescribed\nadministrative action against a person, except in the form of a security\nassessment.184\n44.21 In other words, the ASIO Act does not prevent ASIO from communicating security\nadvice in situations where prescribed administrative action may result.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/volume-4-accountability-and-transparency-annexes.pdf (https://www.ag.gov.au/system/files/2020-12/volume-4-accountability-and-transparency-annexes.PDF)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking",
      "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.",
      "quote": "During the conferences, Consultants identified that:\ny 85% of attendees were at risk of family or domestic violence;\ny 73% were at risk of alcohol or other substance abuse;\ny 68% of matters had a risk of child abuse; and\ny 64% were likely to be experiencing mental health issues.81\nALRC information gathering\n3.105 ALRC inquiry processes enable the ALRC to hear from a wide range of\nstakeholders and users on various topics.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "reviews/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf (https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Always-on policy participation platform",
      "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.",
      "quote": "During the conferences, Consultants identified that:\ny 85% of attendees were at risk of family or domestic violence;\ny 73% were at risk of alcohol or other substance abuse;\ny 68% of matters had a risk of child abuse; and\ny 64% were likely to be experiencing mental health issues.81\nALRC information gathering\n3.105 ALRC inquiry processes enable the ALRC to hear from a wide range of\nstakeholders and users on various topics.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "reviews/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf (https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "legislation_administered": [],
  "artifacts": [
    {
      "category": "strategies",
      "year": "2020",
      "url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
      "file": "strategies/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
      "bytes": 691677,
      "link_text": "Guiding Principles Framework for Good Practice"
    },
    {
      "category": "reviews",
      "year": "2019",
      "url": "https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf",
      "file": "reviews/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf",
      "bytes": 5035874,
      "link_text": "Family Law for the Future – An Inquiry into the Family Law System (final report)"
    },
    {
      "category": "reviews",
      "year": "2020",
      "url": "https://www.ag.gov.au/system/files/2020-12/Government-response-to-the-Comprehensive-Review-of-the-Legal-Framework-of-the-National-Intelligence-Community_1.PDF",
      "file": "reviews/Government-response-to-the-Comprehensive-Review-of-the-Legal-Framework-of-the-Na.pdf",
      "bytes": 1134841,
      "link_text": "Government response to the Comprehensive review of the legal framework of the National Intelligence Community [PDF 1.08 MB]"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": null,
      "url": "https://consultations.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/establishment-of-an-accreditation-scheme-for-ccs/user_uploads/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf",
      "file": "other-pdfs/consultation-impact-analysis-ccs-accreditation.pdf",
      "bytes": 1049332,
      "link_text": "impact analysis"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": "2020",
      "url": "https://www.ag.gov.au/system/files/2020-12/volume-1-recommendations-and-executive-summary-foundations-and-principles-control-coordination-and-cooperation.PDF",
      "file": "other-pdfs/volume-1-recommendations-and-executive-summary-foundations-and-principles-contro.pdf",
      "bytes": 3288023,
      "link_text": "Volume 1 Recommendations and Executive Summary; Foundations and Principles; Control, Coordination and Cooperation [PDF 3.14 MB]"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": "2020",
      "url": "https://www.ag.gov.au/system/files/2020-12/volume-2-authorisations-immunities-and-electronic-surveillance.PDF",
      "file": "other-pdfs/volume-2-authorisations-immunities-and-electronic-surveillance.pdf",
      "bytes": 6379196,
      "link_text": "Volume 2 Authorisations, Immunities and Electronic Surveillance [PDF 6.08 MB]"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": "2020",
      "url": "https://www.ag.gov.au/system/files/2020-12/volume-3-information-technology-powers-and-oversight.PDF",
      "file": "other-pdfs/volume-3-information-technology-powers-and-oversight.pdf",
      "bytes": 2413050,
      "link_text": "Volume 3 Information, Technology, Powers and Oversight [PDF 2.3 MB]"
    },
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": "2020",
      "url": "https://www.ag.gov.au/system/files/2020-12/volume-4-accountability-and-transparency-annexes.PDF",
      "file": "other-pdfs/volume-4-accountability-and-transparency-annexes.pdf",
      "bytes": 1659557,
      "link_text": "Volume 4 Accountability and Transparency; Annexes [PDF 1.58 MB]"
    }
  ],
  "_meta": {
    "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:12:53+00:00",
    "strategy_brief_meta": {
      "model": "nova-micro",
      "folder": "Family-Law-Council",
      "annual_report": {
        "file": null,
        "url": "",
        "year": null
      },
      "corporate_plan": {
        "file": "strategies\\childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.txt",
        "url": "http://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/childrens-contact-services-guiding-principles-framework-good-practice.pdf",
        "year": null
      },
      "usage": {
        "input_tokens": 10712,
        "output_tokens": 996,
        "total_tokens": 11708,
        "model": "nova-micro"
      },
      "cost_usd": 0.00051436,
      "elapsed_seconds": 4.34,
      "generated_at": "2026-05-13T05:16:42+00:00"
    },
    "ideas_manifest": {
      "entity_id": "B-000603",
      "entity_name": "Family Law Council",
      "folder_name": "Family-Law-Council",
      "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:24.921166+00:00",
      "idea_count": 12,
      "markdown": "ideas/Family-Law-Council_ideas.md",
      "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl",
      "inputs": [
        "Family-Law-Council_strategy-overview.md",
        "strategy-evidence.json",
        "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json"
      ]
    },
    "global_intel_meta": null
  }
}