{ "entity_id": "B-004055", "folder": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "type": "Ministerial Council", "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth", "portfolio": "Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, \r\nCommunications, Sport and the Arts", "website": "https://www.atap.gov.au/", "data_status": "partial", "completeness": { "has_strategy_brief": true, "has_strategy_structured": true, "has_vision": false, "has_kpi_targets": true, "has_kpi_results": true, "has_strategy_overview": true, "has_legislation_text": true, "has_legislation_structured": false, "has_global_initiatives_text": false, "has_global_initiatives_structured": false, "n_global_initiatives": 0, "has_ideas": true, "has_artifacts": true, "n_ideas": 12, "n_legislation": 0, "n_artifacts": 5, "n_kpi_targets": 1, "n_kpi_results": 1, "n_outcomes": 2, "verified_own_data": true }, "strategy_profile": { "status": "needs_review", "confidence": "medium", "summary": "Generating a full range of non-capital and capital investment options that consider supply and demand factors, to be assessed against a suitable Base Case (do-minimum).", "official_site_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/", "source_documents": [], "purpose": null, "vision": null, "strategic_priorities": [ { "title": "Generating a full range of non-capital and capital investment options that consider supply and demand factors.", "description": "Generating a full range of non-capital and capital investment options that consider supply and demand factors.", "source_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "source_page": 5, "source_deep_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf#page=5" } ], "values": [ { "name": "Strategic alignment with goals, transport system objectives, strategic plans, policies or policy objectives of the government", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "source_page": null }, { "name": "Delivering net benefits", "description": "", "source_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "source_page": null } ], "outcomes": [ { "name": "Outcome 1: Strategic alignment with goals, transport system objectives, strategic plans, policies or policy objectives of the government", "description": "The assessment process aims to determine the best option in terms of strategic alignment with goals, transport system objectives, strategic plans, policies or policy objectives of the government.", "activities": [ "Stage 1: Strategic alignment — Strategic Merit Test", "Stage 2: Rapid appraisal", "Stage 3: Detailed appraisal" ], "source_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "source_page": 16, "source_deep_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf#page=16" }, { "name": "Outcome 2: Delivering net benefits", "description": "The assessment process aims to determine the best option in terms of the overall economic, social and environmental merit of options, including net benefits (benefits less costs — both monetised and non-monetised), and distributional (equity) effects.", "activities": [ "Stage 2: Rapid appraisal", "Stage 3: Detailed appraisal" ], "source_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "source_page": 16, "source_deep_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf#page=16" } ], "performance_measures": [ { "code": "CCE01", "measure": "Net benefits", "target": "Largest net benefits", "latest_result": "Target met", "status": "Achieved", "target_source_url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "target_source_page": null, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": null } ], "document_alignment_terms": { "must_support": [ "Generating a full range of non-capital and capital investment options that consider supply and demand factors." ], "watch_terms": [ "Net benefits" ], "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": [] }, "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete." }, "global_initiatives": null, "strategy": { "reporting_period": "2024-25", "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26", "vision": null, "vision_source_page": null, "purposes": null, "purposes_source_page": null, "how_we_deliver": "Generating a full range of non-capital and capital investment options that consider supply and demand factors, to be assessed against a suitable Base Case (do-minimum).", "how_we_deliver_source_page": 5, "government_priorities": [ { "text": "Generating a full range of non-capital and capital investment options that consider supply and demand factors.", "source_page": 5 } ], "outcomes": [ { "name": "Outcome 1: Strategic alignment with goals, transport system objectives, strategic plans, policies or policy objectives of the government", "description": "The assessment process aims to determine the best option in terms of strategic alignment with goals, transport system objectives, strategic plans, policies or policy objectives of the government.", "key_activities": [ "Stage 1: Strategic alignment — Strategic Merit Test", "Stage 2: Rapid appraisal", "Stage 3: Detailed appraisal" ], "source_page": 16 }, { "name": "Outcome 2: Delivering net benefits", "description": "The assessment process aims to determine the best option in terms of the overall economic, social and environmental merit of options, including net benefits (benefits less costs — both monetised and non-monetised), and distributional (equity) effects.", "key_activities": [ "Stage 2: Rapid appraisal", "Stage 3: Detailed appraisal" ], "source_page": 16 } ], "values": [ "Strategic alignment with goals, transport system objectives, strategic plans, policies or policy objectives of the government", "Delivering net benefits" ], "values_framework_name": null, "kpi_targets_2025_26": [ { "code": "CCE01", "measure": "Net benefits", "target": "Largest net benefits", "source_page": null } ], "kpi_results_2024_25": [ { "code": "CCE01", "measure": "Net benefits", "result": "Target met", "status": "Achieved", "source_page": null } ], "_source_urls": { "annual_report_url": "", "corporate_plan_url": "" } }, "ideas": [ { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "small", "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners", "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.", "quote": "Where this\nis not the case, consideration needs to be given to how the KPI/target will be measured, and\nthe cost and other implications of developing new tools or methodologies.\n Reflect recognised performance measures — KPIs/targets should incorporate measures that\nare recognised as reliable and appropriate.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "other-pdfs/f1-goals-objectives-kpis-and-targets.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f1-goals-objectives-kpis-and-targets.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "large", "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact", "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "Where this\nis not the case, consideration needs to be given to how the KPI/target will be measured, and\nthe cost and other implications of developing new tools or methodologies.\n Reflect recognised performance measures — KPIs/targets should incorporate measures that\nare recognised as reliable and appropriate.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "other-pdfs/f1-goals-objectives-kpis-and-targets.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f1-goals-objectives-kpis-and-targets.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "small", "title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases", "idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.", "quote": "[Page 39]\nF2 Problem identification & assessment\nReferences\nAustroads 2010, Road Safety Engineering Risk Assessment, Part 7, Crash Rate Database, Technical report\nInfrastructure Australia 2018, Assessment Framework, available at\nhttps://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/assessment-framework-initiatives-and-projects\nKPMG 2011, Manage the future through scenario planning, available at\nhttps://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Manage-the-future-\nthrough-scenario-planning-v3.pdf\nOregon Sustainable Transportation Initiative (OSTI), Scenario Planning Guidelines, available at\nhttps://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Documents/Oregon-Scenario-Planning-Guidelines.pdf\nTransport for NSW, Bureau of transport Statistics, datasets and statistics available at\nwww.bts.nsw.gov.au/Statistics/Statistics?FolderID=214", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "other-pdfs/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "large", "title": "End-to-end case processing redesign", "idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.", "quote": "[Page 39]\nF2 Problem identification & assessment\nReferences\nAustroads 2010, Road Safety Engineering Risk Assessment, Part 7, Crash Rate Database, Technical report\nInfrastructure Australia 2018, Assessment Framework, available at\nhttps://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/assessment-framework-initiatives-and-projects\nKPMG 2011, Manage the future through scenario planning, available at\nhttps://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Manage-the-future-\nthrough-scenario-planning-v3.pdf\nOregon Sustainable Transportation Initiative (OSTI), Scenario Planning Guidelines, available at\nhttps://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Documents/Oregon-Scenario-Planning-Guidelines.pdf\nTransport for NSW, Bureau of transport Statistics, datasets and statistics available at\nwww.bts.nsw.gov.au/Statistics/Statistics?FolderID=214", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "other-pdfs/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "small", "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting", "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.", "quote": "[Page 39]\nF2 Problem identification & assessment\nReferences\nAustroads 2010, Road Safety Engineering Risk Assessment, Part 7, Crash Rate Database, Technical report\nInfrastructure Australia 2018, Assessment Framework, available at\nhttps://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/assessment-framework-initiatives-and-projects\nKPMG 2011, Manage the future through scenario planning, available at\nhttps://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Manage-the-future-\nthrough-scenario-planning-v3.pdf\nOregon Sustainable Transportation Initiative (OSTI), Scenario Planning Guidelines, available at\nhttps://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Documents/Oregon-Scenario-Planning-Guidelines.pdf\nTransport for NSW, Bureau of transport Statistics, datasets and statistics available at\nwww.bts.nsw.gov.au/Statistics/Statistics?FolderID=214", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "large", "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops", "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.", "quote": "[Page 39]\nF2 Problem identification & assessment\nReferences\nAustroads 2010, Road Safety Engineering Risk Assessment, Part 7, Crash Rate Database, Technical report\nInfrastructure Australia 2018, Assessment Framework, available at\nhttps://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/assessment-framework-initiatives-and-projects\nKPMG 2011, Manage the future through scenario planning, available at\nhttps://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Manage-the-future-\nthrough-scenario-planning-v3.pdf\nOregon Sustainable Transportation Initiative (OSTI), Scenario Planning Guidelines, available at\nhttps://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Documents/Oregon-Scenario-Planning-Guidelines.pdf\nTransport for NSW, Bureau of transport Statistics, datasets and statistics available at\nwww.bts.nsw.gov.au/Statistics/Statistics?FolderID=214", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "other-pdfs/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "small", "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates", "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.", "quote": "[Page 10]\nF3 Options generation & assessment\n2.1.4 Service options\n• Increased services – through new routes, more frequent services and longer operating hours\n• Improved integration between modes – such as better coordinated timetables and interchange\narrangements\n• Other options designed to improve services – such as priority measures for public transport\nand improved information for customers.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "other-pdfs/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "large", "title": "Single front door for life-event based services", "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.", "quote": "[Page 10]\nF3 Options generation & assessment\n2.1.4 Service options\n• Increased services – through new routes, more frequent services and longer operating hours\n• Improved integration between modes – such as better coordinated timetables and interchange\narrangements\n• Other options designed to improve services – such as priority measures for public transport\nand improved information for customers.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "other-pdfs/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "small", "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries", "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.", "quote": "Where the related action is\nnot dependent on the appraisal process, the Base Case should include an assumption about whether or\nnot a related action proceeds and the issue should be fully addressed in the risk assessment.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "other-pdfs/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "large", "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system", "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.", "quote": "Where the related action is\nnot dependent on the appraisal process, the Base Case should include an assumption about whether or\nnot a related action proceeds and the issue should be fully addressed in the risk assessment.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "other-pdfs/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "small", "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases", "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.", "quote": "The Bureau\nof Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics (BITRE) has undertaken economic\nassessment of networks using an optimal timing criterion to identify potential investment needs\nwhere there is no budget constraint (see section 1.4 in ATC (2006) and Harvey (1995)).", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/f01-policy-choices-and-system-planning.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f01-policy-choices-and-system-planning.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "large", "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments", "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "The Bureau\nof Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics (BITRE) has undertaken economic\nassessment of networks using an optimal timing criterion to identify potential investment needs\nwhere there is no budget constraint (see section 1.4 in ATC (2006) and Harvey (1995)).", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "other-pdfs/f01-policy-choices-and-system-planning.pdf (https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f01-policy-choices-and-system-planning.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] } ], "legislation_administered": [], "artifacts": [ { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": null, "url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f01-policy-choices-and-system-planning.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/f01-policy-choices-and-system-planning.pdf", "bytes": 1365620, "link_text": "F0.1 Policy Choices and System Planning" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": null, "url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/f02_integrated_transport_and_land_use_planning.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/f02_integrated_transport_and_land_use_planning.pdf", "bytes": 2801641, "link_text": "F0.2 Integrated transport & land use planning" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": null, "url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f1-goals-objectives-kpis-and-targets.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/f1-goals-objectives-kpis-and-targets.pdf", "bytes": 935134, "link_text": "Step 1: Goals, objectives, targets and KPIs" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": null, "url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/f2-problem-identification-and-assessment.pdf", "bytes": 1294725, "link_text": "Step 2: Problem identification, assessment and prioritisation" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": null, "url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "bytes": 1646059, "link_text": "F3 Options generation and assessment" } ], "_meta": { "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:12:29+00:00", "strategy_brief_meta": { "model": "nova-micro", "folder": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "annual_report": { "file": null, "url": "", "year": null }, "corporate_plan": { "file": "other-pdfs\\atap-f3-options-assessment.txt", "url": "https://www.atap.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/atap-f3-options-assessment.pdf", "year": null }, "usage": { "input_tokens": 10475, "output_tokens": 566, "total_tokens": 11041, "model": "nova-micro" }, "cost_usd": 0.00044586500000000004, "elapsed_seconds": 2.8, "generated_at": "2026-05-13T05:15:45+00:00" }, "ideas_manifest": { "entity_id": "B-004055", "entity_name": "Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Steering Committee", "folder_name": "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee", "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:18.705817+00:00", "idea_count": 12, "markdown": "ideas/Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee_ideas.md", "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl", "inputs": [ "Australian-Transport-Assessment-and-Planning-Steering-Committee_strategy-overview.md", "strategy-evidence.json", "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json" ] }, "global_intel_meta": null } }