{
  "entity_id": "O-008172",
  "folder": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
  "name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
  "type": "Non-corporate Commonwealth Entity",
  "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth",
  "portfolio": "Defence",
  "website": "https://www.asa.gov.au",
  "data_status": "partial",
  "completeness": {
    "has_strategy_brief": true,
    "has_strategy_structured": true,
    "has_vision": false,
    "has_kpi_targets": true,
    "has_kpi_results": true,
    "has_strategy_overview": true,
    "has_legislation_text": true,
    "has_legislation_structured": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_text": true,
    "has_global_initiatives_structured": false,
    "n_global_initiatives": 0,
    "has_ideas": true,
    "has_artifacts": true,
    "n_ideas": 12,
    "n_legislation": 0,
    "n_artifacts": 2,
    "n_kpi_targets": 2,
    "n_kpi_results": 2,
    "n_outcomes": 1,
    "verified_own_data": true
  },
  "strategy_profile": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "summary": "Developing the ability to build, sustain and operate conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines is also one of the most significant industrial undertakings in Australia’s history.",
    "official_site_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au",
    "source_documents": [
      {
        "type": "strategie",
        "title": "Download Australia’s AUKUS Submarine Industry Strategy (Opens in a new tab/window)",
        "url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "period": "2025",
        "confidence": "medium"
      },
      {
        "type": "strategie",
        "title": "Australias AUKUS Submarine Industry Strategy - Factsheet.pdf (pdf, 3.73 MB)",
        "url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-Factsheet_0.pdf",
        "period": "2025",
        "confidence": "medium"
      }
    ],
    "purpose": {
      "text": "Developing the ability to build, sustain and operate conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines is also one of the most significant industrial undertakings in Australia’s history.",
      "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
      "source_page": 6,
      "source_deep_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf#page=6"
    },
    "vision": null,
    "strategic_priorities": [
      {
        "title": "Creating demand clarity through proactive and progressive communication as requirements mature",
        "description": "Creating demand clarity through proactive and progressive communication as requirements mature",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": 9,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf#page=9"
      },
      {
        "title": "Increasing investment attractiveness for industry in critical areas",
        "description": "Increasing investment attractiveness for industry in critical areas",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": 9,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf#page=9"
      },
      {
        "title": "Simplifying industrial regulation and processes impacting Australian participation",
        "description": "Simplifying industrial regulation and processes impacting Australian participation",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": 9,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf#page=9"
      },
      {
        "title": "Growing our skilled workforce in partnership with employers, unions, state governments and training providers",
        "description": "Growing our skilled workforce in partnership with employers, unions, state governments and training providers",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": 9,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf#page=9"
      },
      {
        "title": "Integrating into United Kingdom and United States supply chains through qualification of Australian suppliers",
        "description": "Integrating into United Kingdom and United States supply chains through qualification of Australian suppliers",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": 9,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf#page=9"
      }
    ],
    "values": [
      {
        "name": "sovereignty",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "name": "resilience",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "name": "industry growth",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      },
      {
        "name": "high-skilled jobs",
        "description": "",
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": null
      }
    ],
    "outcomes": [
      {
        "name": "Outcome 1: Building and sustaining a sovereign, conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarine capability",
        "description": "The effort to uplift the Australian Submarine Industrial Base so that it is able to build and sustain our future fleet of conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines.",
        "activities": [
          "Ongoing sustainment of Australia’s six Collins class submarines",
          "Participation in United Kingdom and United States submarine supply chains",
          "Support for sustainment of United Kingdom and United States submarines rotating through Australia as part of Submarine Rotational Force-West",
          "Support for sustainment of Australian Virginia class submarines",
          "The build and sustainment of SSN-AUKUS submarines"
        ],
        "source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "source_page": 10,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf#page=10"
      }
    ],
    "performance_measures": [
      {
        "code": "NPS01",
        "measure": "Investment in Australia’s industrial base",
        "target": "$30 billion",
        "latest_result": "$262 million",
        "status": "Partially achieved",
        "target_source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "target_source_page": 54,
        "result_source_url": "",
        "result_source_page": 54
      },
      {
        "code": "NPS02",
        "measure": "Number of Australian suppliers qualified into UK and US supply chains",
        "target": "To be determined",
        "latest_result": "To be determined",
        "status": "Not achieved",
        "target_source_url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "target_source_page": 50,
        "result_source_url": "",
        "result_source_page": 50
      }
    ],
    "document_alignment_terms": {
      "must_support": [
        "Developing the ability to build, sustain and operate conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines is also one of the most significant industrial undertakings in Australia’s his",
        "Creating demand clarity through proactive and progressive communication as requirements mature",
        "Increasing investment attractiveness for industry in critical areas",
        "Simplifying industrial regulation and processes impacting Australian participation",
        "Growing our skilled workforce in partnership with employers, unions, state governments and training providers",
        "Integrating into United Kingdom and United States supply chains through qualification of Australian suppliers"
      ],
      "watch_terms": [
        "Investment in Australia’s industrial base",
        "Number of Australian suppliers qualified into UK and US supply chains"
      ],
      "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": []
    },
    "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete."
  },
  "global_initiatives": null,
  "strategy": {
    "reporting_period": "2024-25",
    "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26",
    "vision": null,
    "vision_source_page": null,
    "purposes": "Developing the ability to build, sustain and operate conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines is also one of the most significant industrial undertakings in Australia’s history.",
    "purposes_source_page": 6,
    "how_we_deliver": "The Government is using a prioritisation framework to guide investments and initiatives to build sovereign Australian industrial capability.",
    "how_we_deliver_source_page": 9,
    "government_priorities": [
      {
        "text": "Creating demand clarity through proactive and progressive communication as requirements mature",
        "source_page": 9
      },
      {
        "text": "Increasing investment attractiveness for industry in critical areas",
        "source_page": 9
      },
      {
        "text": "Simplifying industrial regulation and processes impacting Australian participation",
        "source_page": 9
      },
      {
        "text": "Growing our skilled workforce in partnership with employers, unions, state governments and training providers",
        "source_page": 9
      },
      {
        "text": "Integrating into United Kingdom and United States supply chains through qualification of Australian suppliers",
        "source_page": 9
      }
    ],
    "outcomes": [
      {
        "name": "Outcome 1: Building and sustaining a sovereign, conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarine capability",
        "description": "The effort to uplift the Australian Submarine Industrial Base so that it is able to build and sustain our future fleet of conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines.",
        "key_activities": [
          "Ongoing sustainment of Australia’s six Collins class submarines",
          "Participation in United Kingdom and United States submarine supply chains",
          "Support for sustainment of United Kingdom and United States submarines rotating through Australia as part of Submarine Rotational Force-West",
          "Support for sustainment of Australian Virginia class submarines",
          "The build and sustainment of SSN-AUKUS submarines"
        ],
        "source_page": 10
      }
    ],
    "values": [
      "sovereignty",
      "resilience",
      "industry growth",
      "high-skilled jobs"
    ],
    "values_framework_name": null,
    "kpi_targets_2025_26": [
      {
        "code": "NPS01",
        "measure": "Investment in Australia’s industrial base",
        "target": "$30 billion",
        "source_page": 54
      },
      {
        "code": "NPS02",
        "measure": "Number of Australian suppliers qualified into UK and US supply chains",
        "target": "To be determined",
        "source_page": 50
      }
    ],
    "kpi_results_2024_25": [
      {
        "code": "NPS01",
        "measure": "Investment in Australia’s industrial base",
        "result": "$262 million",
        "status": "Partially achieved",
        "source_page": 54
      },
      {
        "code": "NPS02",
        "measure": "Number of Australian suppliers qualified into UK and US supply chains",
        "result": "To be determined",
        "status": "Not achieved",
        "source_page": 50
      }
    ],
    "_source_urls": {
      "annual_report_url": "",
      "corporate_plan_url": ""
    }
  },
  "ideas": [
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Reusable briefing and summary assistant for internal documents",
      "idea": "Create controlled templates for summarising reports, submissions, minutes, and ministerial briefs.",
      "quote": "[Page 25]\nFigure 3: Target state characteristics\nCAPABILITY CAPACITY RESILIENCE\nThe scope of build and The proportion of aggregate The ability of the ASIB to recover\nsustainment activities to be demand from Australian submarine from shocks or disruptions.\ndelivered by suppliers in the ASIB. programs to be met domestically\nby the ASIB.  Supplier diversity\n Sustainment: Servicing and  Customer diversity\nrefurbishment  All (100%+)\n Financial viability\n Sustainment: Manufacturing  Most (>50%)\nand assembly  Some (>0%)  Supplier agility\n Build: Component manufacture,  None  Security protocols\nassembly, integration, testing\nand evaluation, etc.\n Product development:\nDesign, prototyping\n2.2.1 Capability\nThere are a number of aspects of industry capability required to deliver the Optimal\nPathway that occur over the full life cycle of a submarine.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Department-wide knowledge and briefing platform",
      "idea": "Build a secure knowledge platform that lets staff search, summarise, and cite approved departmental material.",
      "quote": "[Page 25]\nFigure 3: Target state characteristics\nCAPABILITY CAPACITY RESILIENCE\nThe scope of build and The proportion of aggregate The ability of the ASIB to recover\nsustainment activities to be demand from Australian submarine from shocks or disruptions.\ndelivered by suppliers in the ASIB. programs to be met domestically\nby the ASIB.  Supplier diversity\n Sustainment: Servicing and  Customer diversity\nrefurbishment  All (100%+)\n Financial viability\n Sustainment: Manufacturing  Most (>50%)\nand assembly  Some (>0%)  Supplier agility\n Build: Component manufacture,  None  Security protocols\nassembly, integration, testing\nand evaluation, etc.\n Product development:\nDesign, prototyping\n2.2.1 Capability\nThere are a number of aspects of industry capability required to deliver the Optimal\nPathway that occur over the full life cycle of a submarine.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases",
      "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.",
      "quote": "[Page 54]\nThe Government has also commenced a substantial program of infrastructure expansion\nand upgrades:\n\u0017 Up to $8 billion to upgrade HMAS Stirling, with construction starting on a $200 million\nTraining Centre for Australia’s submariner workforce, a further $83 million of near term\ninvestment across 32 separate minor projects, and $2 million for feasibility studies and\nenvironmental and heritage constraint mapping commencing in early 2025;\n\u0017 An initial investment of $127 million over three years to progress planning,\nconsultations, preliminary design and feasibility studies, as well as enabling works for\nthe Defence Precinct at Henderson; and\n\u0017 The selection of Kellogg, Brown and Root and an AECOM / Aurecon Joint Venture\nas Australian Naval Infrastructure’s design partners for the new nuclear powered\nSubmarine Construction Yard at Osborne in South Australia, following the",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments",
      "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "[Page 54]\nThe Government has also commenced a substantial program of infrastructure expansion\nand upgrades:\n\u0017 Up to $8 billion to upgrade HMAS Stirling, with construction starting on a $200 million\nTraining Centre for Australia’s submariner workforce, a further $83 million of near term\ninvestment across 32 separate minor projects, and $2 million for feasibility studies and\nenvironmental and heritage constraint mapping commencing in early 2025;\n\u0017 An initial investment of $127 million over three years to progress planning,\nconsultations, preliminary design and feasibility studies, as well as enabling works for\nthe Defence Precinct at Henderson; and\n\u0017 The selection of Kellogg, Brown and Root and an AECOM / Aurecon Joint Venture\nas Australian Naval Infrastructure’s design partners for the new nuclear powered\nSubmarine Construction Yard at Osborne in South Australia, following the",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners",
      "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.",
      "quote": "Intent of the Strategy\nGuide the development of an Australian Submarine Industrial Base capable of building and sustaining a persistent, potent and sovereign multi-class submarine capability in support of Australia’s National Defence (Chapter 1)\nPrioritise work using a framework to define target states for Australian industrial capability, capacity and resilience (Chapter 2)\nHighlight the significant opportunities for the Australian Submarine Industrial Base, giving Australian suppliers the confidence to invest in uplift and create long-term, stable job opportunities (Chapter 2)\nAcknowledge hurdles to be overcome, and lay out effective, targeted and scalable investment and measures across five lines of effort (Chapters 3 and 4)\nProvide a foundation for future work and continuous refinement, in light of industry progress and program requirements (Chapter 6)\nCommunity information",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "pages/strategies-index.html (https://www.asa.gov.au/business-industry/australias-aukus-submarine-industry-strategy)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Data & Performance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact",
      "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "Intent of the Strategy\nGuide the development of an Australian Submarine Industrial Base capable of building and sustaining a persistent, potent and sovereign multi-class submarine capability in support of Australia’s National Defence (Chapter 1)\nPrioritise work using a framework to define target states for Australian industrial capability, capacity and resilience (Chapter 2)\nHighlight the significant opportunities for the Australian Submarine Industrial Base, giving Australian suppliers the confidence to invest in uplift and create long-term, stable job opportunities (Chapter 2)\nAcknowledge hurdles to be overcome, and lay out effective, targeted and scalable investment and measures across five lines of effort (Chapters 3 and 4)\nProvide a foundation for future work and continuous refinement, in light of industry progress and program requirements (Chapter 6)\nCommunity information",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public",
      "source": "pages/strategies-index.html (https://www.asa.gov.au/business-industry/australias-aukus-submarine-industry-strategy)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Consultation feedback summaries with response tracking",
      "idea": "Summarise consultation submissions by theme and publish what changed in response.",
      "quote": "[Page 58]\n6.2 Industry involvement in delivering the Industry\nStrategy\nDeveloping and evolving a resilient Australian Submarine Industrial Base to deliver each\nphase of the Optimal Pathway cannot be done by Government alone; it will require true\npartnership with Australian industry.\n\u0017 An Industry Council will be established as a consultative forum to review overall uplift\nprogress, identify challenges and emerging risks, and explore opportunities for further\nexpansion of industry capability.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Citizen Participation",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Always-on policy participation platform",
      "idea": "Create a standing participation platform where citizens and stakeholders can propose, vote, and track ideas.",
      "quote": "[Page 58]\n6.2 Industry involvement in delivering the Industry\nStrategy\nDeveloping and evolving a resilient Australian Submarine Industrial Base to deliver each\nphase of the Optimal Pathway cannot be done by Government alone; it will require true\npartnership with Australian industry.\n\u0017 An Industry Council will be established as a consultative forum to review overall uplift\nprogress, identify challenges and emerging risks, and explore opportunities for further\nexpansion of industry capability.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / stakeholders / policy teams",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting",
      "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.",
      "quote": "[Page 40]\nFrom 1 September 2024, the changes to Australia’s export control mechanisms enable:\n\u0017 Licence-free trade for over 70 per cent of defence exports from the United States\nto Australia that are subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulations;\n\u0017 Licence-free trade for over 80 per cent of defence exports from the United States\nto Australia that are subject to Export Administration Regulations;\n\u0017 The elimination of around 900 export permits required under the previous export\ncontrols from Australia to the United States and United Kingdom, valued at $5 billion\nper year; and\n\u0017 The removal of approximately 200 export permits required for defence exports\nfrom the United Kingdom to Australia, valued at over $129 million per year.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops",
      "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.",
      "quote": "[Page 40]\nFrom 1 September 2024, the changes to Australia’s export control mechanisms enable:\n\u0017 Licence-free trade for over 70 per cent of defence exports from the United States\nto Australia that are subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulations;\n\u0017 Licence-free trade for over 80 per cent of defence exports from the United States\nto Australia that are subject to Export Administration Regulations;\n\u0017 The elimination of around 900 export permits required under the previous export\ncontrols from Australia to the United States and United Kingdom, valued at $5 billion\nper year; and\n\u0017 The removal of approximately 200 export permits required for defence exports\nfrom the United Kingdom to Australia, valued at over $129 million per year.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries",
      "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.",
      "quote": "[Page 58]\n6.2 Industry involvement in delivering the Industry\nStrategy\nDeveloping and evolving a resilient Australian Submarine Industrial Base to deliver each\nphase of the Optimal Pathway cannot be done by Government alone; it will require true\npartnership with Australian industry.\n\u0017 An Industry Council will be established as a consultative forum to review overall uplift\nprogress, identify challenges and emerging risks, and explore opportunities for further\nexpansion of industry capability.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system",
      "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.",
      "quote": "[Page 58]\n6.2 Industry involvement in delivering the Industry\nStrategy\nDeveloping and evolving a resilient Australian Submarine Industrial Base to deliver each\nphase of the Optimal Pathway cannot be done by Government alone; it will require true\npartnership with Australian industry.\n\u0017 An Industry Council will be established as a consultative forum to review overall uplift\nprogress, identify challenges and emerging risks, and explore opportunities for further\nexpansion of industry capability.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf (https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "legislation_administered": [],
  "artifacts": [
    {
      "category": "strategies",
      "year": "2025",
      "url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
      "file": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
      "bytes": 5301712,
      "link_text": "Download Australia’s AUKUS Submarine Industry Strategy (Opens in a new tab/window)"
    },
    {
      "category": "strategies",
      "year": "2025",
      "url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-Factsheet_0.pdf",
      "file": "strategies/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-Factsheet_0.pdf",
      "bytes": 3912749,
      "link_text": "Australias AUKUS Submarine Industry Strategy - Factsheet.pdf (pdf, 3.73 MB)"
    }
  ],
  "_meta": {
    "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:12:28+00:00",
    "strategy_brief_meta": {
      "model": "nova-micro",
      "folder": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "annual_report": {
        "file": null,
        "url": "",
        "year": null
      },
      "corporate_plan": {
        "file": "strategies\\Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.txt",
        "url": "https://www.asa.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2025-03/Australias-AUKUS-Submarine-Industry-Strategy-3.pdf",
        "year": null
      },
      "usage": {
        "input_tokens": 10454,
        "output_tokens": 767,
        "total_tokens": 11221,
        "model": "nova-micro"
      },
      "cost_usd": 0.00047327000000000003,
      "elapsed_seconds": 3.95,
      "generated_at": "2026-05-13T05:15:45+00:00"
    },
    "ideas_manifest": {
      "entity_id": "O-008172",
      "entity_name": "Australian Submarine Agency",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Submarine-Agency",
      "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:04:54.307231+00:00",
      "idea_count": 12,
      "markdown": "ideas/Australian-Submarine-Agency_ideas.md",
      "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl",
      "inputs": [
        "Australian-Submarine-Agency_strategy-overview.md",
        "strategy-evidence.json",
        "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json"
      ]
    },
    "global_intel_meta": null
  }
}