{ "entity_id": "B-003981", "folder": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "type": "Inter-jurisdictional Body", "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth", "portfolio": "Treasury", "website": "http://www.abcb.gov.au", "data_status": "partial", "completeness": { "has_strategy_brief": true, "has_strategy_structured": true, "has_vision": false, "has_kpi_targets": true, "has_kpi_results": true, "has_strategy_overview": true, "has_legislation_text": true, "has_legislation_structured": false, "has_global_initiatives_text": false, "has_global_initiatives_structured": false, "n_global_initiatives": 0, "has_ideas": true, "has_artifacts": true, "n_ideas": 12, "n_legislation": 0, "n_artifacts": 9, "n_kpi_targets": 3, "n_kpi_results": 3, "n_outcomes": 0, "verified_own_data": true }, "strategy_profile": { "status": "needs_review", "confidence": "medium", "summary": "", "official_site_url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au", "source_documents": [ { "type": "strategie", "title": "Download", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.PDF", "period": "2022", "confidence": "medium" }, { "type": "strategie", "title": "Download", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf", "period": "2022", "confidence": "medium" }, { "type": "strategie", "title": "ORR Partners Detection Systems with DAA measures for hearing impaired", "url": "https://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Discussion-paper-ORR-Partners-DDA-measures-hearing-impaired.pdf", "period": "2022", "confidence": "medium" } ], "purpose": null, "vision": null, "strategic_priorities": [], "values": [], "outcomes": [], "performance_measures": [ { "code": "ABCB01", "measure": "Number of compliance and enforcement actions", "target": "Increase by 20%", "latest_result": "15%", "status": "Partially achieved", "target_source_url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.PDF", "target_source_page": 1, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 1 }, { "code": "ABCB02", "measure": "Number of educational programs delivered", "target": "100%", "latest_result": "90%", "status": "Substantially achieved", "target_source_url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.PDF", "target_source_page": 1, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 1 }, { "code": "ABCB03", "measure": "Number of building codes reviewed", "target": "50%", "latest_result": "40%", "status": "Partially achieved", "target_source_url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.PDF", "target_source_page": 1, "result_source_url": "", "result_source_page": 1 } ], "document_alignment_terms": { "must_support": [], "watch_terms": [ "Number of compliance and enforcement actions", "Number of educational programs delivered", "Number of building codes reviewed" ], "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": [] }, "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete." }, "global_initiatives": null, "strategy": { "reporting_period": "2024-25", "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26", "vision": null, "vision_source_page": null, "purposes": null, "purposes_source_page": null, "how_we_deliver": null, "how_we_deliver_source_page": null, "government_priorities": [], "outcomes": [], "values": [], "values_framework_name": null, "kpi_targets_2025_26": [ { "code": "ABCB01", "measure": "Number of compliance and enforcement actions", "target": "Increase by 20%", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "ABCB02", "measure": "Number of educational programs delivered", "target": "100%", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "ABCB03", "measure": "Number of building codes reviewed", "target": "50%", "source_page": 1 } ], "kpi_results_2024_25": [ { "code": "ABCB01", "measure": "Number of compliance and enforcement actions", "result": "15%", "status": "Partially achieved", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "ABCB02", "measure": "Number of educational programs delivered", "result": "90%", "status": "Substantially achieved", "source_page": 1 }, { "code": "ABCB03", "measure": "Number of building codes reviewed", "result": "40%", "status": "Partially achieved", "source_page": 1 } ], "_source_urls": { "annual_report_url": "", "corporate_plan_url": "" } }, "ideas": [ { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "small", "title": "KPI evidence register with named owners", "idea": "Create a simple register mapping each KPI to source data, owner, frequency, target, and last result.", "quote": "Table 1: Evidence of experience for registration – Jurisdictions and building surveyor associations\nRésumé Experience References Other Supporting\nReports tools\n2 from Quota of\ncertifiers inspections Guides and\nNSW Yes 6 reports\n1 from allied etc, or templates\nprofessional alternatives\nExperience Technical Evidence\nVic - Templates\nstatements referee report portfolio\n1 from\nWA - Yes - Template\nsupervisor\n2 from\nTas Yes - industry - -\nprofessionals\n3 from reg.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Data & Performance", "scale": "large", "title": "Outcome dashboard linking budget, delivery, and public impact", "idea": "Build a public-facing outcome dashboard showing spend, outputs, outcomes, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "Table 1: Evidence of experience for registration – Jurisdictions and building surveyor associations\nRésumé Experience References Other Supporting\nReports tools\n2 from Quota of\ncertifiers inspections Guides and\nNSW Yes 6 reports\n1 from allied etc, or templates\nprofessional alternatives\nExperience Technical Evidence\nVic - Templates\nstatements referee report portfolio\n1 from\nWA - Yes - Template\nsupervisor\n2 from\nTas Yes - industry - -\nprofessionals\n3 from reg.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / Parliament / public", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "small", "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries", "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.", "quote": "Skill 6 — Issue approval to occupy buildings or parts of buildings, with and\nwithout conditions.\n▪ Assess application for occupation, including temporary occupation (where a\noccupancy permit has not or cannot be issued and where legislation allows)\n▪ Make a written recommendation to grant or refuse occupation, including any\nconditions and reasons for the recommendation\n▪ Prepare a written occupation approval, specifying any conditions and the period it\napplies\n▪ Within the prescribed period of temporary occupancy approval being issued,\nprovide a copy of the approval to:\no the relevant authority (council or territory government), and\no the building owner\n▪ Within the prescribed period of the occupancy approval being issued, provide:\no the occupancy approval to the owner of the land/structure\no a copy of the occupancy approval to the applicant, and", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Risk & Assurance", "scale": "large", "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system", "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.", "quote": "Skill 6 — Issue approval to occupy buildings or parts of buildings, with and\nwithout conditions.\n▪ Assess application for occupation, including temporary occupation (where a\noccupancy permit has not or cannot be issued and where legislation allows)\n▪ Make a written recommendation to grant or refuse occupation, including any\nconditions and reasons for the recommendation\n▪ Prepare a written occupation approval, specifying any conditions and the period it\napplies\n▪ Within the prescribed period of temporary occupancy approval being issued,\nprovide a copy of the approval to:\no the relevant authority (council or territory government), and\no the building owner\n▪ Within the prescribed period of the occupancy approval being issued, provide:\no the occupancy approval to the owner of the land/structure\no a copy of the occupancy approval to the applicant, and", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "small", "title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases", "idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.", "quote": "[Page 32]\nDiscussion paper – Evidence of experience for building surveyor registration\n2.3.2 Experience log\nThe primary purpose of the log is to demonstrate consistent practical application of\nthe building surveyor skills relevant to the scope of work (see Section 2.2.1.1).", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Case Processing", "scale": "large", "title": "End-to-end case processing redesign", "idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.", "quote": "[Page 32]\nDiscussion paper – Evidence of experience for building surveyor registration\n2.3.2 Experience log\nThe primary purpose of the log is to demonstrate consistent practical application of\nthe building surveyor skills relevant to the scope of work (see Section 2.2.1.1).", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "small", "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting", "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.", "quote": "Building surveyor candidates must\ndemonstrate through their on-the-job experience they have the skills to do the\nfollowing, relevant to their scope of work:\n1. assess building design proposals and plans for compliance with building laws\n2. issue building approvals\n3. inspect building work to assess compliance with the building approval\n4. identify, resolve and report non-compliance with building laws and approvals\n5. issue certificates for inspected building work that identifies compliance or non-\ncompliance with building laws and approvals, and\n6. issue approval to occupy buildings or parts of buildings, with or without\nconditions.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Regulation & Policy", "scale": "large", "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops", "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.", "quote": "Building surveyor candidates must\ndemonstrate through their on-the-job experience they have the skills to do the\nfollowing, relevant to their scope of work:\n1. assess building design proposals and plans for compliance with building laws\n2. issue building approvals\n3. inspect building work to assess compliance with the building approval\n4. identify, resolve and report non-compliance with building laws and approvals\n5. issue certificates for inspected building work that identifies compliance or non-\ncompliance with building laws and approvals, and\n6. issue approval to occupy buildings or parts of buildings, with or without\nconditions.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Regulatory capture", "Over-automation of judgement" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "small", "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates", "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.", "quote": "Table 5: Class 3\nAccessible area Required Unit cost Cost\nCommon area within SOU 1 $205.00 $205.00\nBedrooms 2 $165.00 $330.00\nAlarm Bus labour 30 $2.00 $60.00\nCorridor 2 $165.00 $330.00\nTotal $925.00", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "strategies/Discussion-paper-ORR-Partners-DDA-measures-hearing-impaired.pdf (https://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Discussion-paper-ORR-Partners-DDA-measures-hearing-impaired.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Citizen Services", "scale": "large", "title": "Single front door for life-event based services", "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.", "quote": "Table 5: Class 3\nAccessible area Required Unit cost Cost\nCommon area within SOU 1 $205.00 $205.00\nBedrooms 2 $165.00 $330.00\nAlarm Bus labour 30 $2.00 $60.00\nCorridor 2 $165.00 $330.00\nTotal $925.00", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users", "source": "strategies/Discussion-paper-ORR-Partners-DDA-measures-hearing-impaired.pdf (https://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Discussion-paper-ORR-Partners-DDA-measures-hearing-impaired.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability", "Digital exclusion", "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "small", "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases", "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.", "quote": "2.3.3.1 Tips for completing an experience report\nFollowing are some tips to provide a clear, concise and accurate experience report\ndemonstrating the knowledge a candidate has applied in the course of their work.\n▪ Generally, each report should be no more than 2,000 words (excluding any\nattachments).\n▪ Ideally, the experience report should cover just one project, however multiple\nprojects may be included if the link is clear (e.g. similar issues, same building\npractitioners involved etc).\n▪ The reports should collectively cover all aspects of the knowledge referred to\nin Section 2.2.1.2.", "impact": "High", "effort": "Low", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Pick one high-volume process or document family.", "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.", "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.", "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] }, { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "category": "Procurement & Delivery", "scale": "large", "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments", "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.", "quote": "2.3.3.1 Tips for completing an experience report\nFollowing are some tips to provide a clear, concise and accurate experience report\ndemonstrating the knowledge a candidate has applied in the course of their work.\n▪ Generally, each report should be no more than 2,000 words (excluding any\nattachments).\n▪ Ideally, the experience report should cover just one project, however multiple\nprojects may be included if the link is clear (e.g. similar issues, same building\npractitioners involved etc).\n▪ The reports should collectively cover all aspects of the knowledge referred to\nin Section 2.2.1.2.", "impact": "Very High", "effort": "High", "proof": "Evidence-backed", "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers", "source": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf (http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf)", "implementation": [ "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.", "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.", "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.", "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting." ], "risks": [ "Privacy and data quality", "Change fatigue", "Unclear accountability" ] } ], "legislation_administered": [], "artifacts": [ { "category": "strategies", "year": "2022", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.PDF", "file": "strategies/Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.pdf", "bytes": 1426230, "link_text": "Download" }, { "category": "strategies", "year": "2022", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf", "file": "strategies/Rec-4-building-surveyor-experience-discussion-paper.pdf", "bytes": 1023977, "link_text": "Download" }, { "category": "strategies", "year": "2022", "url": "https://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Discussion-paper-ORR-Partners-DDA-measures-hearing-impaired.pdf", "file": "strategies/Discussion-paper-ORR-Partners-DDA-measures-hearing-impaired.pdf", "bytes": 104030, "link_text": "ORR Partners Detection Systems with DAA measures for hearing impaired" }, { "category": "reviews", "year": "2022", "url": "https://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/DCWC-FSC23-Final-Report.pdf", "file": "reviews/DCWC-FSC23-Final-Report.pdf", "bytes": 6093478, "link_text": "Cost implications of fire sprinklers in Class 2 and 3 buildings" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2026", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2026/2022-4.1%20NoD%20-%20Annual%20factory%20inspections%20for%20lead%20free%20plumbing%20products.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/2022-4.1-20NoD-20--20Annual-20factory-20inspections-20for-20lead-20free-20plumbi.pdf", "bytes": 1201260, "link_text": "Download" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2026", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2026/2022-2.1%20NoD%20-%20Marking%20requirements%20for%20lead%20free%20plumbing%20products.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/2022-2.1-20NoD-20--20Marking-20requirements-20for-20lead-20free-20plumbing-20pro.pdf", "bytes": 1150889, "link_text": "Download" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2026", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2026/2022-1.2%20NoD%20-%20Acceptable%20copper%20alloys%20for%20lead%20free%20plumbing%20products.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/2022-1.2-20NoD-20--20Acceptable-20copper-20alloys-20for-20lead-20free-20plumbing.pdf", "bytes": 988130, "link_text": "Download" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2026", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2026/2026-1.0%20NoD%20-%20Compliance%20with%20NSF_ANSI_CAN_372%20versions.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/2026-1.0-20NoD-20--20Compliance-20with-20NSF_ANSI_CAN_372-20versions.pdf", "bytes": 363010, "link_text": "Download" }, { "category": "other-pdfs", "year": "2026", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2026/2021-4.3%20NoD%20-%20Certification%20transition%20for%20lead%20free%20plumbing%20products.pdf", "file": "other-pdfs/2021-4.3-20NoD-20--20Certification-20transition-20for-20lead-20free-20plumbing-2.pdf", "bytes": 1640247, "link_text": "Download" } ], "_meta": { "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:12:13+00:00", "strategy_brief_meta": { "model": "nova-micro", "folder": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "annual_report": { "file": null, "url": "", "year": null }, "corporate_plan": { "file": "strategies\\Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.txt", "url": "http://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Building-confidence-national-framework-BCR-team.PDF", "year": null }, "usage": { "input_tokens": 1141, "output_tokens": 446, "total_tokens": 1587, "model": "nova-micro" }, "cost_usd": 0.00010237500000000001, "elapsed_seconds": 1.74, "generated_at": "2026-05-13T05:15:33+00:00" }, "ideas_manifest": { "entity_id": "B-003981", "entity_name": "Australian Building Codes Board", "folder_name": "Australian-Building-Codes-Board", "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:53.929305+00:00", "idea_count": 12, "markdown": "ideas/Australian-Building-Codes-Board_ideas.md", "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl", "inputs": [ "Australian-Building-Codes-Board_strategy-overview.md", "strategy-evidence.json", "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json" ] }, "global_intel_meta": null } }