{
  "entity_id": "O-000797",
  "folder": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
  "name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
  "type": "Corporate Commonwealth Entity",
  "jurisdiction": "Commonwealth",
  "portfolio": "Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, \r\nCommunications, Sport and the Arts",
  "website": "http://www.abc.net.au/",
  "data_status": "partial",
  "completeness": {
    "has_strategy_brief": true,
    "has_strategy_structured": true,
    "has_vision": false,
    "has_kpi_targets": true,
    "has_kpi_results": false,
    "has_strategy_overview": true,
    "has_legislation_text": true,
    "has_legislation_structured": false,
    "has_global_initiatives_text": true,
    "has_global_initiatives_structured": false,
    "n_global_initiatives": 0,
    "has_ideas": true,
    "has_artifacts": true,
    "n_ideas": 12,
    "n_legislation": 0,
    "n_artifacts": 1,
    "n_kpi_targets": 2,
    "n_kpi_results": 0,
    "n_outcomes": 1,
    "verified_own_data": true
  },
  "strategy_profile": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "summary": "To present quantitative economic analysis on how proposed housing policy reforms would affect the housing market and the broader economy over time, including through government taxation revenue, total housing starts, the level of output and employment in the construction sector housing, dwelling rents, and broader economic outcomes.",
    "official_site_url": "http://www.abc.net.au/",
    "source_documents": [],
    "purpose": {
      "text": "To present quantitative economic analysis on how proposed housing policy reforms would affect the housing market and the broader economy over time, including through government taxation revenue, total housing starts, the level of output and employment in the construction sector housing, dwelling rents, and broader economic outcomes.",
      "source_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
      "source_page": 10,
      "source_deep_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf#page=10"
    },
    "vision": null,
    "strategic_priorities": [
      {
        "title": "Removal or restriction of negative gearing for investment properties, under alternate eligibility or grandfathering arra",
        "description": "Removal or restriction of negative gearing for investment properties, under alternate eligibility or grandfathering arrangements.",
        "source_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
        "source_page": 10,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf#page=10"
      },
      {
        "title": "Removal restriction of the 50 per cent CGT discount for property assets, again under alternate eligibility or grandfathe",
        "description": "Removal restriction of the 50 per cent CGT discount for property assets, again under alternate eligibility or grandfathering arrangements.",
        "source_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
        "source_page": 10,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf#page=10"
      }
    ],
    "values": [],
    "outcomes": [
      {
        "name": "Economic impacts of housing policy reforms",
        "description": "The economic impacts of removing negative gearing provisions and the CGT discount would be cumulative, with both adding to ‘user costs’ for property investments. Together, these scenarios could force many property investors with multiple properties or who are early-stage investors (who rely most acutely on negative gearing provisions) to sell.",
        "activities": [
          "Removing negative gearing provisions",
          "Removing the CGT discount"
        ],
        "source_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
        "source_page": 9,
        "source_deep_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf#page=9"
      }
    ],
    "performance_measures": [
      {
        "code": "NG01",
        "measure": "Reduction in GDP due to removal of negative gearing",
        "target": "-$3.1 billion",
        "latest_result": "",
        "status": "",
        "target_source_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
        "target_source_page": 6,
        "result_source_url": "",
        "result_source_page": null
      },
      {
        "code": "CGT01",
        "measure": "Reduction in GDP due to removal of CGT discount",
        "target": "-$2.255 billion",
        "latest_result": "",
        "status": "",
        "target_source_url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
        "target_source_page": 8,
        "result_source_url": "",
        "result_source_page": null
      }
    ],
    "document_alignment_terms": {
      "must_support": [
        "To present quantitative economic analysis on how proposed housing policy reforms would affect the housing market and the broader economy over time, including through government tax",
        "Removal or restriction of negative gearing for investment properties, under alternate eligibility or grandfathering arrangements.",
        "Removal restriction of the 50 per cent CGT discount for property assets, again under alternate eligibility or grandfathering arrangements."
      ],
      "watch_terms": [
        "Reduction in GDP due to removal of negative gearing",
        "Reduction in GDP due to removal of CGT discount"
      ],
      "avoid_claiming_without_evidence": []
    },
    "review_note": "Structured strategy exists but is incomplete."
  },
  "global_initiatives": null,
  "strategy": {
    "reporting_period": "2024-25",
    "corporate_plan_period": "2025-26",
    "vision": null,
    "vision_source_page": null,
    "purposes": "To present quantitative economic analysis on how proposed housing policy reforms would affect the housing market and the broader economy over time, including through government taxation revenue, total housing starts, the level of output and employment in the construction sector housing, dwelling rents, and broader economic outcomes.",
    "purposes_source_page": 10,
    "how_we_deliver": null,
    "how_we_deliver_source_page": null,
    "government_priorities": [
      {
        "text": "Removal or restriction of negative gearing for investment properties, under alternate eligibility or grandfathering arrangements.",
        "source_page": 10
      },
      {
        "text": "Removal restriction of the 50 per cent CGT discount for property assets, again under alternate eligibility or grandfathering arrangements.",
        "source_page": 10
      }
    ],
    "outcomes": [
      {
        "name": "Economic impacts of housing policy reforms",
        "description": "The economic impacts of removing negative gearing provisions and the CGT discount would be cumulative, with both adding to ‘user costs’ for property investments. Together, these scenarios could force many property investors with multiple properties or who are early-stage investors (who rely most acutely on negative gearing provisions) to sell.",
        "key_activities": [
          "Removing negative gearing provisions",
          "Removing the CGT discount"
        ],
        "source_page": 9
      }
    ],
    "values": [],
    "values_framework_name": null,
    "kpi_targets_2025_26": [
      {
        "code": "NG01",
        "measure": "Reduction in GDP due to removal of negative gearing",
        "target": "-$3.1 billion",
        "source_page": 6
      },
      {
        "code": "CGT01",
        "measure": "Reduction in GDP due to removal of CGT discount",
        "target": "-$2.255 billion",
        "source_page": 8
      }
    ],
    "kpi_results_2024_25": [],
    "_source_urls": {
      "annual_report_url": "",
      "corporate_plan_url": ""
    }
  },
  "ideas": [
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Regulatory burden scan for forms, guidance, and reporting",
      "idea": "Identify the top 10 highest-friction reporting obligations and simplify guidance, forms, or evidence requirements.",
      "quote": "The first year direct fiscal impact of the policy change assessed purely under the framework of\nrevenue foregone would be the raising of an additional $3.0 billion in tax revenue from\nresidential investment housing, rising to $4.7 billion by the end of the decade (the green\ncolumns in the chart).",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Regulation & Policy",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Adaptive regulation program with live feedback loops",
      "idea": "Create an adaptive regulation model using sandboxes, industry data, risk scoring, and regular rule updates.",
      "quote": "The first year direct fiscal impact of the policy change assessed purely under the framework of\nrevenue foregone would be the raising of an additional $3.0 billion in tax revenue from\nresidential investment housing, rising to $4.7 billion by the end of the decade (the green\ncolumns in the chart).",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Regulated entities / policy teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Reusable briefing and summary assistant for internal documents",
      "idea": "Create controlled templates for summarising reports, submissions, minutes, and ministerial briefs.",
      "quote": "If you or anyone you know needs help:\nLifeline\non 131 114\nKids Helpline\non 1800 551 800\nBeyond Blue\non 1300 224 636\n13 YARN\non 13 92 76\nSuicide Call Back Service\non 1300 659 467\nMensLine Australia\non 1300 789 978\nHeadspace\non 1800 650 890\nReachOut\nSANE\non 1800 187 263\nDr Allen, a demographer, told the committee hearing investigating higher education governance that Ms Bishop had been \"arrogant\" towards staff.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__14.html (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-08/julie-bishop-resigns-as-anu-chancellor/106657576)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Staff Productivity",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Department-wide knowledge and briefing platform",
      "idea": "Build a secure knowledge platform that lets staff search, summarise, and cite approved departmental material.",
      "quote": "If you or anyone you know needs help:\nLifeline\non 131 114\nKids Helpline\non 1800 551 800\nBeyond Blue\non 1300 224 636\n13 YARN\non 13 92 76\nSuicide Call Back Service\non 1300 659 467\nMensLine Australia\non 1300 789 978\nHeadspace\non 1800 650 890\nReachOut\nSANE\non 1800 187 263\nDr Allen, a demographer, told the committee hearing investigating higher education governance that Ms Bishop had been \"arrogant\" towards staff.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "APS staff / executives",
      "source": "pages/announcements-index__14.html (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-08/julie-bishop-resigns-as-anu-chancellor/106657576)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Sensitive information leakage",
        "Inconsistent quality of generated drafts"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Case Processing",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Triage queue for stuck or ageing cases",
      "idea": "Use existing case data to flag ageing, duplicate, incomplete, or high-risk cases for earlier intervention.",
      "quote": "This compares to an assessment of the full revenue foregone by the\nParliamentary Budget Office starting from $7.2 billion and increasing to $8.5 billion (the blue\ncolumns) as shown in Chart 2-1 (both estimates in 2024-25 dollars).",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Case Processing",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "End-to-end case processing redesign",
      "idea": "Redesign the case pathway around risk-based triage, reusable evidence, and automated eligibility checks.",
      "quote": "This compares to an assessment of the full revenue foregone by the\nParliamentary Budget Office starting from $7.2 billion and increasing to $8.5 billion (the blue\ncolumns) as shown in Chart 2-1 (both estimates in 2024-25 dollars).",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Applicants / case officers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Plain-language service pages and proactive status updates",
      "idea": "Rewrite high-volume pages and letters into plain language, add status notifications, and measure contact reduction.",
      "quote": "Published:\nWed 1 Apr 2026 at 9:27am\nWed 1 Apr 2026 at 9:27am\nProducts and Services\nFind out how to download your favourite app.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/about.html (https://www.abc.net.au/about)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Citizen Services",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Single front door for life-event based services",
      "idea": "Bundle services around life events so citizens can complete related steps across agencies in one journey.",
      "quote": "Published:\nWed 1 Apr 2026 at 9:27am\nWed 1 Apr 2026 at 9:27am\nProducts and Services\nFind out how to download your favourite app.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Citizens / service users",
      "source": "pages/about.html (https://www.abc.net.au/about)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Digital exclusion",
        "Low public trust if feedback is not acted on"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Procurement lessons library for repeat purchases",
      "idea": "Capture reusable procurement clauses, market lessons, supplier performance notes, and common evaluation criteria.",
      "quote": "Average construction sector employment is projected to be up to 3,162\nFTE jobs lower than business-as-usual as a result of the slowdown in the sector, and the reduced\nsupply is projected to increase rents on dwellings by up to 1.7 per cent by the end of the decade, all in\ncomparison to what would be observed in the business-as-usual scenario.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Procurement & Delivery",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Portfolio delivery office for major investments",
      "idea": "Stand up a portfolio delivery office that tracks benefits, risks, dependencies, procurement, and delivery confidence.",
      "quote": "Average construction sector employment is projected to be up to 3,162\nFTE jobs lower than business-as-usual as a result of the slowdown in the sector, and the reduced\nsupply is projected to increase rents on dwellings by up to 1.7 per cent by the end of the decade, all in\ncomparison to what would be observed in the business-as-usual scenario.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Delivery teams / suppliers",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "small",
      "title": "Recommendation tracker for audits, reviews, and inquiries",
      "idea": "Publish a single internal tracker for audit/review recommendations, owners, due dates, and implementation evidence.",
      "quote": "The broad grandfathering arrangements in this scenario again reduces the direct\nfiscal impact in comparison to Scenario 1.\no The different challenges that face development depending on location (for\nexample, high density metropolitan versus urban fringe) have not been captured\nin this modelling – for example, the relative challenge of delivering new dwellings\nin existing urban centres where there is simultaneously high demand from\nrenters.\n- Scenarios 6, 7 and 8 present variations on CGT discount settings, and as such are most\nreadily compared to the high-impact results of Scenario 2.\no In each of these scenarios we retain broad grandfathering as compared to the\nmore restrictive grandfathering arrangements of Scenario 2, which reduce the\nfiscal consequences of the altered tax arrangements and the subsequent\neconomy wide impacts.\no Scenario 6 has only modest economy wide impact.",
      "impact": "High",
      "effort": "Low",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Pick one high-volume process or document family.",
        "Name an owner and baseline current volume, time, cost, and satisfaction.",
        "Run a 4-8 week pilot with clear before/after metrics.",
        "Publish lessons and decide whether to scale."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "category": "Risk & Assurance",
      "scale": "large",
      "title": "Integrated assurance and lessons-learned system",
      "idea": "Create an assurance system that connects audit findings, risk registers, delivery reviews, and investment decisions.",
      "quote": "The broad grandfathering arrangements in this scenario again reduces the direct\nfiscal impact in comparison to Scenario 1.\no The different challenges that face development depending on location (for\nexample, high density metropolitan versus urban fringe) have not been captured\nin this modelling – for example, the relative challenge of delivering new dwellings\nin existing urban centres where there is simultaneously high demand from\nrenters.\n- Scenarios 6, 7 and 8 present variations on CGT discount settings, and as such are most\nreadily compared to the high-impact results of Scenario 2.\no In each of these scenarios we retain broad grandfathering as compared to the\nmore restrictive grandfathering arrangements of Scenario 2, which reduce the\nfiscal consequences of the altered tax arrangements and the subsequent\neconomy wide impacts.\no Scenario 6 has only modest economy wide impact.",
      "impact": "Very High",
      "effort": "High",
      "proof": "Evidence-backed",
      "beneficiaries": "Executives / assurance teams",
      "source": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf (https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf)",
      "implementation": [
        "Create a senior responsible owner and cross-functional delivery team.",
        "Map legislation, data, privacy, procurement, cyber, and workforce constraints.",
        "Co-design with users and frontline staff before technology selection.",
        "Stage delivery through pilots, benefits tracking, and public reporting."
      ],
      "risks": [
        "Privacy and data quality",
        "Change fatigue",
        "Unclear accountability",
        "Regulatory capture",
        "Over-automation of judgement"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "legislation_administered": [],
  "artifacts": [
    {
      "category": "other-pdfs",
      "year": "2026",
      "url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
      "file": "other-pdfs/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
      "bytes": 462492,
      "link_text": "Modelling for the property industry"
    }
  ],
  "_meta": {
    "snapshot_built_at": "2026-05-14T02:12:13+00:00",
    "strategy_brief_meta": {
      "model": "nova-micro",
      "folder": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "annual_report": {
        "file": null,
        "url": "",
        "year": null
      },
      "corporate_plan": {
        "file": "other-pdfs\\The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.txt",
        "url": "https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/The-impacts-of-potential-housing-policy-settings-Summary-Report.pdf",
        "year": null
      },
      "usage": {
        "input_tokens": 12683,
        "output_tokens": 521,
        "total_tokens": 13204,
        "model": "nova-micro"
      },
      "cost_usd": 0.000516845,
      "elapsed_seconds": 3.42,
      "generated_at": "2026-05-13T05:15:35+00:00"
    },
    "ideas_manifest": {
      "entity_id": "O-000797",
      "entity_name": "Australian Broadcasting Corporation",
      "folder_name": "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation",
      "generated_at": "2026-05-09T23:05:14.461959+00:00",
      "idea_count": 12,
      "markdown": "ideas/Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation_ideas.md",
      "jsonl": "ideas/ideas.jsonl",
      "inputs": [
        "Australian-Broadcasting-Corporation_strategy-overview.md",
        "strategy-evidence.json",
        "global-intelligence/source-manifest.json"
      ]
    },
    "global_intel_meta": null
  }
}